From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fixups for mpc8360 rev. 2.1 erratum #2 (RGMII Timing) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:30:06 -0500 Message-ID: <4742389E.5080700@pobox.com> References: <20071105121530.5c38fbb7.kim.phillips@freescale.com> <20071119173652.55e385b2.kim.phillips@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Li Yang , paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org To: Kim Phillips Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071119173652.55e385b2.kim.phillips@freescale.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Kim Phillips wrote: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:15:30 -0600 > Kim Phillips wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360, >> according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basically the >> most intrusive part is the addition of two new RGMII Internal Delay >> modes; one for TX delay only, and the other for RX delay only (i.e, not >> both at the same time). >> >> Please review, and since this affects both netdev and powerpc trees, >> one maintainer should ack them for the other to push upstream (i.e, >> Kumar acks them, and Leo picks them up to go through netdev or the >> other way around; either way is fine with me). I'm hoping they're >> trivial enough to go in 2.6.24. >> > Kumar, Leo, > > re-ping due to (a) it's been 2 weeks and (b) Anton Vorontsov has since > issued his Tested-by. > > Might I suggest Kumar ack the powerpc patches, and Leo/Jeff apply 5/5 > to go through netdev? FWIW I just got back from vacation... I'm grabbing what DaveM has collected into davem/netdev-2.6.git, and then going from there... Jeff