* [PATCH][IPVS] Fix compiler warning about unused register_ip_vs_protocol
@ 2007-11-20 12:08 Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-21 1:38 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Emelyanov @ 2007-11-20 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: Linux Netdev List, devel
This is silly, but I have turned the CONFIG_IP_VS to m,
to check the compilation of one (recently sent) fix
and set all the CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_XXX options to n to
speed up the compilation.
In this configuration the compiler warns me about
CC [M] net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.o
net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c:49: warning: ‘register_ip_vs_protocol’ defined but not used
Indeed. With no protocols selected there are no
calls to this function - all are compiled out with
ifdefs.
Maybe the best fix would be to surround this call with
ifdef-s or tune the Kconfig dependences, but I think that
marking this register function as __used is enough. No?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c b/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c
index e844ddb..c0e11ec 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static struct ip_vs_protocol *ip_vs_proto_table[IP_VS_PROTO_TAB_SIZE];
/*
* register an ipvs protocol
*/
-static int register_ip_vs_protocol(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp)
+static int __used register_ip_vs_protocol(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp)
{
unsigned hash = IP_VS_PROTO_HASH(pp->protocol);
--
1.5.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][IPVS] Fix compiler warning about unused register_ip_vs_protocol
2007-11-20 12:08 [PATCH][IPVS] Fix compiler warning about unused register_ip_vs_protocol Pavel Emelyanov
@ 2007-11-21 1:38 ` Simon Horman
2007-11-21 1:44 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2007-11-21 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Emelyanov; +Cc: David Miller, Linux Netdev List, devel
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:08:42PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> This is silly, but I have turned the CONFIG_IP_VS to m,
> to check the compilation of one (recently sent) fix
> and set all the CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_XXX options to n to
> speed up the compilation.
>
> In this configuration the compiler warns me about
>
> CC [M] net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.o
> net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c:49: warning: ‘register_ip_vs_protocol’ defined but not used
>
> Indeed. With no protocols selected there are no
> calls to this function - all are compiled out with
> ifdefs.
>
> Maybe the best fix would be to surround this call with
> ifdef-s or tune the Kconfig dependences, but I think that
> marking this register function as __used is enough. No?
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
That is kind of interesting.
On the one hand it might be more correct in some way to use some Kconfig
foo to get rid of register_ip_vs_protocol, and also most of
the body of ‘register_ip_vs_protocol() if no protocols are defined.
But on the other hand, its really a corner case, because in practice if
you are going to use IPVS then you are going to need at least one
protocol. So I'm happy with the simplicity of the __used solution, even
though strictly speaking it is a lie.
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c b/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c
> index e844ddb..c0e11ec 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static struct ip_vs_protocol *ip_vs_proto_table[IP_VS_PROTO_TAB_SIZE];
> /*
> * register an ipvs protocol
> */
> -static int register_ip_vs_protocol(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp)
> +static int __used register_ip_vs_protocol(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp)
> {
> unsigned hash = IP_VS_PROTO_HASH(pp->protocol);
>
> --
> 1.5.3.4
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Horms
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][IPVS] Fix compiler warning about unused register_ip_vs_protocol
2007-11-21 1:38 ` Simon Horman
@ 2007-11-21 1:44 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2007-11-21 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: horms; +Cc: xemul, netdev, devel
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:38:02 +0900
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:08:42PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > This is silly, but I have turned the CONFIG_IP_VS to m,
> > to check the compilation of one (recently sent) fix
> > and set all the CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_XXX options to n to
> > speed up the compilation.
> >
> > In this configuration the compiler warns me about
> >
> > CC [M] net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.o
> > net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c:49: warning: ‘register_ip_vs_protocol’ defined but not used
> >
> > Indeed. With no protocols selected there are no
> > calls to this function - all are compiled out with
> > ifdefs.
> >
> > Maybe the best fix would be to surround this call with
> > ifdef-s or tune the Kconfig dependences, but I think that
> > marking this register function as __used is enough. No?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
>
> That is kind of interesting.
>
> On the one hand it might be more correct in some way to use some Kconfig
> foo to get rid of register_ip_vs_protocol, and also most of
> the body of ‘register_ip_vs_protocol() if no protocols are defined.
>
> But on the other hand, its really a corner case, because in practice if
> you are going to use IPVS then you are going to need at least one
> protocol. So I'm happy with the simplicity of the __used solution, even
> though strictly speaking it is a lie.
>
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Ok, I've applied Pavel's patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-21 1:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-20 12:08 [PATCH][IPVS] Fix compiler warning about unused register_ip_vs_protocol Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-21 1:38 ` Simon Horman
2007-11-21 1:44 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).