netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
@ 2007-11-27 14:47 Andrew Gallatin
  2007-11-30  9:59 ` Herbert Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Gallatin @ 2007-11-27 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: Jan-Bernd Themann, netdev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 320 bytes --]

The inet_lro.c:lro_gen_skb() function fails to include
NET_IP_ALIGN padding at the front of the sk_buffs it creates,
leading to alignment warnings on architectures which require
strict alignment (seen on sparc64).  The attached patch
adds NET_IP_ALIGN padding.

Signed off by: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>

Drew


[-- Attachment #2: lro_align.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 508 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
index ac3b1d3..91e9371 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
@@ -401,10 +401,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *lro_gen_skb(struc
 	int data_len = len;
 	int hdr_len = min(len, hlen);
 
-	skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen);
+	skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen + NET_IP_ALIGN);
 	if (!skb)
 		return NULL;
 
+	skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
 	skb->len = len;
 	skb->data_len = len - hdr_len;
 	skb->truesize += true_size;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
  2007-11-27 14:47 [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment Andrew Gallatin
@ 2007-11-30  9:59 ` Herbert Xu
  2007-11-30 18:35   ` Andrew Gallatin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2007-11-30  9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Gallatin; +Cc: davem, ossthema, netdev

Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
> index ac3b1d3..91e9371 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
> @@ -401,10 +401,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *lro_gen_skb(struc
>        int data_len = len;
>        int hdr_len = min(len, hlen);
> 
> -       skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen);
> +       skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen + NET_IP_ALIGN);

NET_IP_ALIGN should only be used if you're DMAing into the skb head.
Otherwise you should say 2.  It would be nice to have another macro
for that I suppose.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
  2007-11-30  9:59 ` Herbert Xu
@ 2007-11-30 18:35   ` Andrew Gallatin
  2007-11-30 19:14     ` Roland Dreier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Gallatin @ 2007-11-30 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: davem, ossthema, netdev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 813 bytes --]

Herbert Xu wrote:
> Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
>> index ac3b1d3..91e9371 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
>> @@ -401,10 +401,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *lro_gen_skb(struc
>>        int data_len = len;
>>        int hdr_len = min(len, hlen);
>>
>> -       skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen);
>> +       skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen + NET_IP_ALIGN);
> 
> NET_IP_ALIGN should only be used if you're DMAing into the skb head.
> Otherwise you should say 2.  It would be nice to have another macro
> for that I suppose.

It is certainly simple enough to say 2.  Thank you for pointing
this out.  I have attached a patch to do that..

Signed off by: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>

Drew

[-- Attachment #2: lro_align_2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
index ac3b1d3..35b816e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
@@ -401,10 +401,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *lro_gen_skb(struc
 	int data_len = len;
 	int hdr_len = min(len, hlen);
 
-	skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen);
+	skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen + 2);
 	if (!skb)
 		return NULL;
 
+	skb_reserve(skb, 2);
 	skb->len = len;
 	skb->data_len = len - hdr_len;
 	skb->truesize += true_size;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
  2007-11-30 18:35   ` Andrew Gallatin
@ 2007-11-30 19:14     ` Roland Dreier
  2007-11-30 19:35       ` Andrew Gallatin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Roland Dreier @ 2007-11-30 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Gallatin; +Cc: Herbert Xu, davem, ossthema, netdev

 > >> -       skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen);
 > >> +       skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen + NET_IP_ALIGN);
 > > NET_IP_ALIGN should only be used if you're DMAing into the skb head.
 > > Otherwise you should say 2.  It would be nice to have another macro
 > > for that I suppose.
 > 
 > It is certainly simple enough to say 2.  Thank you for pointing
 > this out.  I have attached a patch to do that..
 > 
 > Signed off by: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>

Isn't the value of 2 ethernet-specific (to round the 14-byte header up
to 16)?  Given that the rest of the lro code is fairly careful to
calculate mac_hdr_len etc it seems as if it would be cleaner to make
this independent of the specific L2 being used.

(And I plan on using the LRO module for IP-over-InfiniBand so this is
not completely theoretical)

 - R.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
  2007-11-30 19:14     ` Roland Dreier
@ 2007-11-30 19:35       ` Andrew Gallatin
  2007-11-30 22:34         ` Herbert Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Gallatin @ 2007-11-30 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roland Dreier; +Cc: Herbert Xu, davem, ossthema, netdev

Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > >> -       skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen);
>  > >> +       skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen + NET_IP_ALIGN);
>  > > NET_IP_ALIGN should only be used if you're DMAing into the skb head.
>  > > Otherwise you should say 2.  It would be nice to have another macro
>  > > for that I suppose.
>  > 
>  > It is certainly simple enough to say 2.  Thank you for pointing
>  > this out.  I have attached a patch to do that..
>  > 
>  > Signed off by: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>
> 
> Isn't the value of 2 ethernet-specific (to round the 14-byte header up
> to 16)?  Given that the rest of the lro code is fairly careful to
> calculate mac_hdr_len etc it seems as if it would be cleaner to make
> this independent of the specific L2 being used.
> 
> (And I plan on using the LRO module for IP-over-InfiniBand so this is
> not completely theoretical)

Good point.  I tend to think all the world is ethernet.
Perhaps the better way would be to simply add an alignment pad
field to lro_mgr?  When the driver initializes it, it specifies
any padding needed.  Ethernet drivers would specify 2.

Is this acceptable?

Drew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
  2007-11-30 19:35       ` Andrew Gallatin
@ 2007-11-30 22:34         ` Herbert Xu
  2007-12-03  0:07           ` Andrew Gallatin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2007-11-30 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Gallatin; +Cc: Roland Dreier, davem, ossthema, netdev

On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:35:43PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> >Isn't the value of 2 ethernet-specific (to round the 14-byte header up
> >to 16)?  Given that the rest of the lro code is fairly careful to
> >calculate mac_hdr_len etc it seems as if it would be cleaner to make
> >this independent of the specific L2 being used.
> >
> >(And I plan on using the LRO module for IP-over-InfiniBand so this is
> >not completely theoretical)

Good point!

We really should rename NET_IP_ALIGN so that both Ethernet and DMA
occur in it somehow :)

> Good point.  I tend to think all the world is ethernet.
> Perhaps the better way would be to simply add an alignment pad
> field to lro_mgr?  When the driver initializes it, it specifies
> any padding needed.  Ethernet drivers would specify 2.

Just pass in the mac_hdr_len, and calculate the padding as

	ALIGN(mac_hdr_len, 4) - mac_hdr_len

or even simpler

	~(mac_hdr_len - 1) & 3

Bonus points for putting this in a macro alongside NET_IP_ALIGN :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
  2007-11-30 22:34         ` Herbert Xu
@ 2007-12-03  0:07           ` Andrew Gallatin
  2007-12-03  9:29             ` Herbert Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Gallatin @ 2007-12-03  0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: Roland Dreier, davem, ossthema, netdev

Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:35:43PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>>> Isn't the value of 2 ethernet-specific (to round the 14-byte header up
>>> to 16)?  Given that the rest of the lro code is fairly careful to
>>> calculate mac_hdr_len etc it seems as if it would be cleaner to make
>>> this independent of the specific L2 being used.
>>>
>>> (And I plan on using the LRO module for IP-over-InfiniBand so this is
>>> not completely theoretical)
> 
> Good point!
> 
> We really should rename NET_IP_ALIGN so that both Ethernet and DMA
> occur in it somehow :)
> 
>> Good point.  I tend to think all the world is ethernet.
>> Perhaps the better way would be to simply add an alignment pad
>> field to lro_mgr?  When the driver initializes it, it specifies
>> any padding needed.  Ethernet drivers would specify 2.
> 
> Just pass in the mac_hdr_len, and calculate the padding as

That was my first thought as well, but it turns out that
when lro_gen_skb() is called via the out1 label, mac_hdr_len
may not be known.  It seemed simplest and cleanest to just
make it a field in lro_mgr.

Drew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
  2007-12-03  0:07           ` Andrew Gallatin
@ 2007-12-03  9:29             ` Herbert Xu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2007-12-03  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Gallatin; +Cc: Roland Dreier, davem, ossthema, netdev

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:07:26PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> 
> That was my first thought as well, but it turns out that
> when lro_gen_skb() is called via the out1 label, mac_hdr_len
> may not be known.  It seemed simplest and cleanest to just
> make it a field in lro_mgr.

Fair enough.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-03  9:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-27 14:47 [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment Andrew Gallatin
2007-11-30  9:59 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-30 18:35   ` Andrew Gallatin
2007-11-30 19:14     ` Roland Dreier
2007-11-30 19:35       ` Andrew Gallatin
2007-11-30 22:34         ` Herbert Xu
2007-12-03  0:07           ` Andrew Gallatin
2007-12-03  9:29             ` Herbert Xu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).