From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro. Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:01:20 -0800 Message-ID: <474CCBF0.5060809@hp.com> References: <20071122343.446909000@suse.de> <200711261228.15155.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20071126102533.1c774870@freepuppy.rosehill.pdx.hemminger.net> <20071127190037.GB30057@redhat.com> <20071127210942.GF3406@stusta.de> <474C88EB.9040300@hp.com> <20071127213837.GG3406@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Jones , Stephen Hemminger , Rusty Russell , Roland Dreier , Andi Kleen , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org To: Adrian Bunk Return-path: Received: from g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.44]:15267 "EHLO g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751463AbXK1CCX (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:02:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071127213837.GG3406@stusta.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 01:15:23PM -0800, Rick Jones wrote: > >>>The real problem is that these drivers are not in the upstream kernel. >>> >>>Are there common reasons why these drivers are not upstream? >> >>One might be that upstream has not accepted them. Anything doing or >>smelling of TOE comes to mind right away. > > > Which modules doing or smelling of TOE do work with unmodified vendor > kernels? At the very real risk of further demonstrating my Linux vocabulary limitations, I believe there is a "Linux Sockets Acceleration" module/whatnot for NetXen and related 10G NICs, and a cxgb3_toe (?) module for Chelsio 10G NICs. rick jones