From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Acker Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e100 on systems that have cache incoherent DMA Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:50:37 -0500 Message-ID: <474DC68D.9020003@roinet.com> References: <20071108181741.8648.61629.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <474DBDA6.50705@roinet.com> <474DBFCE.8010101@intel.com> <474DC0F3.8070604@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Kok, Auke" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, miltonm@bga.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([72.92.88.10]:40865 "EHLO smtp.roinet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753250AbXK1Tu7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:50:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <474DC0F3.8070604@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Kok, Auke wrote: >> David Acker wrote: >>> What is the status of this patch? >> >> Jeff merged it in netdev-2.6#upstream so it is queued for 2.6.25. >> >> However, we could consider pushing this patch to 2.6.24 since it's a >> valid fix. >> Andrew has also been carrying this patch in -mm for a while and so >> have we over >> here without issues. >> >> Jeff, what do you think? > > IMO it's too late into 2.6.24-rc to push it. It needs the additional > exposure that 2.6.25 merge window will give it. Since we don't have > people actively complaining today, there is no need to stir the pot for > 2.6.24-rc. This sounds good to me. Thanks! -Ack