From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laszlo Attila Toth Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 0/5 + 3] Interface group patches Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:39:28 +0100 Message-ID: <474EEB40.7090507@balabit.hu> References: <11963527094077-git-send-email-panther@balabit.hu> <474EE7F7.5000108@trash.net> Reply-To: panther@balabit.hu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Netfilter Development Mailinglist To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from www.balabit.hu ([212.92.18.33]:41689 "EHLO lists.balabit.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758246AbXK2Qjb (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:39:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <474EE7F7.5000108@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy =EDrta: > Laszlo Attila Toth wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This is the 7th version of our interface group patches. >=20 >=20 >> Patches: >> [1/5] Remove unnecessary locks from rtnetlink (in do_setlink) >> [2/5] rtnetlink: send a single notification on device state changes >> [3/5] Interface group: core (netlink) part >> [4/5] Ifgroup read/write support in sysfs >=20 > I vote for these to go in, they're ready and there's no use in > reposting them again and again. I see, sorry. In fact, I didn't missed it. But you said the removing of the locks in=20 the rtnl needs a separate patch. This is why I resent _all_. >> [iptables]Interface group match >=20 > This one I would queue until we have released the 1.4.0 version > of iptables. I don't want to release things that are not in > at least a -rc kernel yet. Later I'll resend it in two patches, one for extending iptables with=20 hash tables and one for the ifgroup match. >=20 >> [iproute2 1/2] Added IFLA_NET_NS_PID as in kernel v2.6.24-rc1 >> [iproute2 2/2] Interface group as new ip link option >=20 > And for these Stephen has to decide, but both look fine to me. >=20 >=20 --=20 Attila