From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 iptables]Interface group match Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:15:27 +0100 Message-ID: <474EF3AF.3070201@trash.net> References: <11955644701165-git-send-email-panther@balabit.hu> <1195564470928-git-send-email-panther@balabit.hu> <11955644702451-git-send-email-panther@balabit.hu> <11955644701536-git-send-email-panther@balabit.hu> <11955644702194-git-send-email-panther@balabit.hu> <20071123133933.GA31396@innominate.com> <474EB585.30407@balabit.hu> <474EE5C6.9070500@trash.net> <474EE79F.2000409@balabit.hu> <474EE86E.2010201@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: panther@balabit.hu, Lutz Jaenicke , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:51176 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755644AbXK2RPh (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:15:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Nov 29 2007 17:27, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> The syntax "name/0xmask" is simply too strange for me. >> Then how about name/name with masks also defined in rt_ifgroup? >> The same question applies for marks of course. >> > I would find that confusing, which is why the new xt_TOS only > allows names when no /mask or a mask of /allbits is used. Its still useful, you don't have to use it :) Another alternative would be to allow defining names to val/mask.