From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Divy Le Ray Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cxgb - driver fixes. Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:26:15 -0800 Message-ID: <4751ED97.5090804@chelsio.com> References: <474C8BF8.9080609@chelsio.com> <474F0422.6090309@candelatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Garzik , NetDev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH To: Ben Greear Return-path: Received: from stargate.chelsio.com ([12.22.49.110]:8869 "EHLO stargate.chelsio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752648AbXLAX0m (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 18:26:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <474F0422.6090309@candelatech.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ben Greear wrote: > Divy Le Ray wrote: >> Jeff, >> >> I'm submitting a patch series for inclusion in 2.6.24 for the cxgb >> driver. >> The patches are built against Linus'git tree. >> >> Here is a brief description: >> - Ensure that GSO skbs have enough headroom before encapsulating them, >> - Fix a crash in NAPI mode, >> - Fix statistics accounting and report. > > We ran pktgen overnight on 2.6.23 with patch 1 and 3 applied (patch 2 > not needed on .23 it seems) and it was stable at about 1.5Gbps > bi-directional > using 1500 MTU sized frames. > > We'll run some more tests with user-space TCP & UDP today, but it > looks good > so far. > > Perhaps these patches should be considered for .23 stable as well? > > Thanks, > Ben > Yes, patches 1 and 3 could be considered for .22 and .23-stable, along with the previous fix: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=7de6af0f23b25df8da9719ecae1916b669d0b03d Cheers, Divy