From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wang Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [UDP]: Restore missing inDatagrams increments Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:20:25 +0800 Message-ID: <47566D59.1080905@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20071204125844.GA2750@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071204130109.GA3098@gondor.apana.org.au> <47560215.6050104@cn.fujitsu.com> <20071205021559.GA27707@gondor.apana.org.au> <475663D4.9040806@cn.fujitsu.com> <20071205090228.GA14659@gondor.apana.org.au> <475669B0.4030501@cn.fujitsu.com> <20071205091028.GA15006@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from [222.73.24.84] ([222.73.24.84]:53738 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751743AbXLEJXN (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 04:23:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071205091028.GA15006@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Herbert Xu said the following on 2007-12-5 17:10: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:04:48PM +0800, Wang Chen wrote: >> Yes, now, sunrpc only supports INET and INET6. >> But UDPX_INC_STATS_BH is defined in udp.h, in case others use it :) > > Which other family would that be :) > Maybe AF_UNSPEC? It's joke:) I just more like switch to avoid false positive problem.