netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <475F00A2.6020406@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071211123705.844aac24.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <mbligh@google.com> wrote:
> 
>>>
>>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
>>> over
>>>  to e1000e.  So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
>>> CONFIG_E1000E.
>>>
>>>
>> Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was on, rather
>> than screwing
>> everybody for no good reason (plus breaking all the automated testing, etc
>> etc)?
>> Much though I love random refactoring, it is fairly painful to just keep
>> changing the
>> names of things.
> 
> (cc netdev and Auke)
> 
> Yes, that would be very sensible.  CONFIG_E1000E should default to whatever
> CONFIG_E1000 was set to.

which is "y" for x86 and friends, ppc, arm and ia64 through 'defconfig'. the
Kconfig files do not have defaults in them.

I can send a patch to adjust the defconfig files, would that be OK? I certainly
think that would be reasonable, I dislike setting defaults through defconfig for
network drivers myself and rather would not do that.

Auke

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-11 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20071204211701.994dfce6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-12-06  6:59 ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
2007-12-06  7:09   ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 David Miller
2007-12-07 13:16     ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Ilpo Järvinen
2007-12-12 17:57       ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Cedric Le Goater
2007-12-06  7:35   ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Andrew Morton
2007-12-10 12:24     ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Ilpo Järvinen
2007-12-10 20:05       ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Ilpo Järvinen
2007-12-12 19:21       ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Cedric Le Goater
2007-12-13 17:38         ` tcp_sacktag_one() WARNING (was Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1) Cedric Le Goater
     [not found] ` <475D51C7.6010809@reub.net>
2007-12-10 21:11   ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Andrew Morton
2007-12-11 14:12     ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
     [not found] ` <33307c790712110813h23def95dvd068b7226e9fcd36@mail.gmail.com>
2007-12-11 20:37   ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Andrew Morton
2007-12-11 21:20     ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 21:26     ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-12-11 21:59       ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Kok, Auke
2007-12-11 22:10       ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Andrew Morton
2007-12-11 22:17         ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Kok, Auke
2007-12-11 23:15           ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Randy Dunlap
2007-12-12  4:16 ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Rik van Riel
2007-12-13 17:45 ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 - BUG in tcp_fragment Cedric Le Goater
2007-12-13 23:00   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2007-12-14  6:52     ` Cedric Le Goater
2007-12-14 20:14     ` [PATCH net-2.6.25] Revert recent TCP work Ilpo Järvinen
2007-12-16 22:21       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=475F00A2.6020406@intel.com \
    --to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).