netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: joonwpark81@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:29:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47601A73.5010804@myri.com> (raw)

[I apologize for loosing threading, I'm replying from the archives]

 > The problem is that the driver is doing a NAPI completion and
 > re-enabling chip interrupts with work_done == weight, and that is
 > illegal.

The only time at least myri10ge will do this is due to
the !netif_running(netdev) check.   Eg, from myri10ge's poll:

	work_done = myri10ge_clean_rx_done(mgp, budget);

	if (work_done < budget || !netif_running(netdev)) {
		netif_rx_complete(netdev, napi);
		put_be32(htonl(3), mgp->irq_claim);
	}

Is the netif_running() check even required? Is this just
a bad way to solve a race with running NAPI at down() time
that would be better solved by putting a napi_synchronize()
in the driver's down() routine?

I'd rather fix this right than add another check to a
questionable code path.

Thanks,

Drew

             reply	other threads:[~2007-12-12 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-12 17:29 Andrew Gallatin [this message]
2007-12-12 17:38 ` [RFC] net: napi fix David Miller
2007-12-12 17:40   ` Andrew Gallatin
2007-12-12 18:41   ` Kok, Auke
2007-12-13  7:41     ` Joonwoo Park
2007-12-13 14:13       ` Andrew Gallatin
2007-12-13 14:19         ` David Miller
2007-12-13 16:45           ` Kok, Auke
2007-12-13 18:22           ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-13 19:02             ` Andrew Gallatin
2007-12-13 19:09               ` David Miller
2007-12-13 19:35                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-13 20:38                   ` David Miller
2007-12-14  2:06         ` Joonwoo Park
2007-12-13 13:49     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 13:50       ` David Miller
2007-12-13 14:14         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 20:16         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 20:37           ` David Miller
2007-12-13 20:41             ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-13 21:55               ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 22:28             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 22:34               ` David Miller
2007-12-13 22:58                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-20  9:52   ` Robert Olsson
2007-12-20 11:22     ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-12  4:01 [PATCH 6/7] : tehuti Fix possible causing oops of net_rx_action Joonwoo Park
2007-12-12  5:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-12  5:46   ` [RFC] net: napi fix Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-12  6:05     ` Joonwoo Park
2007-12-12 15:22       ` David Miller
2007-12-12 15:21     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47601A73.5010804@myri.com \
    --to=gallatin@myri.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=joonwpark81@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).