From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@oracle.com,
auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:39:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4762E9FE.1070707@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200712140002.lBE02pUb025505@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>
> Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's
> machiens don't stop working when they use oldconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
> Cc: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff -puN drivers/net/Kconfig~e1000e-make-e1000e-default-to-the-same-kconfig-setting-as-e1000 drivers/net/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig~e1000e-make-e1000e-default-to-the-same-kconfig-setting-as-e1000
> +++ a/drivers/net/Kconfig
> @@ -1986,6 +1986,7 @@ config E1000_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT
> config E1000E
> tristate "Intel(R) PRO/1000 PCI-Express Gigabit Ethernet support"
> depends on PCI
> + default E1000
I am not inclined to apply this one. This practice, applied over time,
will tend to accumulate weird 'default' and 'select' statements.
So I think the breakage that occurs is mitigated by two factors:
1) kernel hackers that do their own configs are expected to be able to
figure this stuff.
2) kernel builders (read: distros, mainly) are expected to have put
thought into the Kconfig selection and driver migration strategies.
PCI IDs move across drivers from time, and we don't want to apply these
sorts changes: Viewed in the long term, the suggested patch is merely a
temporary change to allow kernel experts to more easily deal with the
PCI ID migration across drivers.
I would prefer simply to communicate to kernel experts and builders
about a Kconfig issue that could potentially their booting/networking...
because this patch is only needed if the kernel experts do not already
know about a necessary config update.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-14 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-14 0:02 [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000 akpm
2007-12-14 20:39 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-12-14 22:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-14 23:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-12-15 0:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-14 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 23:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-15 4:57 ` Bill Fink
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4762E9FE.1070707@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).