From: Dany Madden <drt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Lijun Pan <lijunp213@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ibm: replenish rx pool and poll less frequently
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 10:58:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4765c54a8cb7b87ae1d7db928c44f40b@imap.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210602170156.41643-1-lijunp213@gmail.com>
On 2021-06-02 10:01, Lijun Pan wrote:
> The old mechanism replenishes rx pool even only one frames is processed
> in
> the poll function, which causes lots of overheads. The old mechanism
> restarts polling until processed frames reaches the budget, which can
> cause the poll function to loop into restart_poll 63 times at most and
> to
> call replenish_rx_poll 63 times at most. This will cause soft lockup
> very
> easily. So, don't replenish too often, and don't goto restart_poll in
> each
> poll function. If there are pending descriptors, fetch them in the next
> poll instance.
Does this improve performance?
>
> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <lijunp213@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 15 +++------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> index ffb2a91750c7..fae1eaa39dd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> @@ -2435,7 +2435,6 @@ static int ibmvnic_poll(struct napi_struct
> *napi, int budget)
> frames_processed = 0;
> rx_scrq = adapter->rx_scrq[scrq_num];
>
> -restart_poll:
> while (frames_processed < budget) {
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> struct ibmvnic_rx_buff *rx_buff;
> @@ -2512,20 +2511,12 @@ static int ibmvnic_poll(struct napi_struct
> *napi, int budget)
> }
>
> if (adapter->state != VNIC_CLOSING &&
> - ((atomic_read(&adapter->rx_pool[scrq_num].available) <
> - adapter->req_rx_add_entries_per_subcrq / 2) ||
> - frames_processed < budget))
There is a budget that the driver should adhere to. Even one frame, it
should still process the frame within a budget.
> + (atomic_read(&adapter->rx_pool[scrq_num].available) <
> + adapter->req_rx_add_entries_per_subcrq / 2))
> replenish_rx_pool(adapter, &adapter->rx_pool[scrq_num]);
> if (frames_processed < budget) {
> - if (napi_complete_done(napi, frames_processed)) {
> + if (napi_complete_done(napi, frames_processed))
> enable_scrq_irq(adapter, rx_scrq);
> - if (pending_scrq(adapter, rx_scrq)) {
> - if (napi_reschedule(napi)) {
> - disable_scrq_irq(adapter, rx_scrq);
> - goto restart_poll;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> }
> return frames_processed;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-02 17:01 [PATCH net-next] net: ibm: replenish rx pool and poll less frequently Lijun Pan
2021-06-02 17:47 ` Rick Lindsley
2021-06-02 17:58 ` Dany Madden [this message]
2021-06-02 18:23 ` Dany Madden
2021-06-02 19:25 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4765c54a8cb7b87ae1d7db928c44f40b@imap.linux.ibm.com \
--to=drt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=lijunp213@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).