From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.25 1/3] Uninline the __inet_hash function
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:21:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47690CD1.9060502@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4768F77E.5090201@openvz.org>
Pavel Emelyanov a écrit :
> This one is used in quite many places in the networking code and
> seems to big to be inline.
>
> After the patch net/ipv4/build-in.o loses 725 bytes:
> add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/5 up/down: 374/-1099 (-725)
> function old new delta
> __inet_hash - 374 +374
> tcp_sacktag_write_queue 2255 2254 -1
> __inet_lookup_listener 284 274 -10
> tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock 755 495 -260
> tcp_v4_hash 389 40 -349
> inet_hash_connect 1165 686 -479
>
> Exporting this is for dccp module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
>
> ---
>
> include/net/inet_hashtables.h | 27 ++-------------------------
> net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> index 37f6cb1..1a43125 100644
> --- a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> +++ b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> @@ -264,31 +264,8 @@ static inline void inet_listen_unlock(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo)
> wake_up(&hashinfo->lhash_wait);
> }
>
> -static inline void __inet_hash(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo,
> - struct sock *sk, const int listen_possible)
> -{
> - struct hlist_head *list;
> - rwlock_t *lock;
> -
> - BUG_TRAP(sk_unhashed(sk));
> - if (listen_possible && sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
> - list = &hashinfo->listening_hash[inet_sk_listen_hashfn(sk)];
> - lock = &hashinfo->lhash_lock;
> - inet_listen_wlock(hashinfo);
> - } else {
> - struct inet_ehash_bucket *head;
> - sk->sk_hash = inet_sk_ehashfn(sk);
> - head = inet_ehash_bucket(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
> - list = &head->chain;
> - lock = inet_ehash_lockp(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
> - write_lock(lock);
> - }
> - __sk_add_node(sk, list);
> - sock_prot_inc_use(sk->sk_prot);
> - write_unlock(lock);
> - if (listen_possible && sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
> - wake_up(&hashinfo->lhash_wait);
> -}
> +extern void __inet_hash(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo, struct sock *sk,
> + const int listen_possible);
>
> static inline void inet_hash(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo, struct sock *sk)
> {
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> index 67704da..46f899b 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> @@ -267,6 +267,33 @@ static inline u32 inet_sk_port_offset(const struct sock *sk)
> inet->dport);
> }
>
> +void __inet_hash(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo, struct sock *sk,
> + const int listen_possible)
> +{
> + struct hlist_head *list;
> + rwlock_t *lock;
> +
> + BUG_TRAP(sk_unhashed(sk));
> + if (listen_possible && sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
> + list = &hashinfo->listening_hash[inet_sk_listen_hashfn(sk)];
> + lock = &hashinfo->lhash_lock;
> + inet_listen_wlock(hashinfo);
> + } else {
> + struct inet_ehash_bucket *head;
> + sk->sk_hash = inet_sk_ehashfn(sk);
> + head = inet_ehash_bucket(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
> + list = &head->chain;
> + lock = inet_ehash_lockp(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
> + write_lock(lock);
> + }
> + __sk_add_node(sk, list);
> + sock_prot_inc_use(sk->sk_prot);
> + write_unlock(lock);
> + if (listen_possible && sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
> + wake_up(&hashinfo->lhash_wait);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__inet_hash);
> +
> /*
> * Bind a port for a connect operation and hash it.
> */
If you un-inline this (good idea), I am not sure we still need listen_possible
argument.
It was usefull only to help compiler to zap dead code (since it was known at
compile time), now it only adds some extra test and argument passing.
Thank you
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-19 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-19 10:50 [PATCH net-2.6.25 1/3] Uninline the __inet_hash function Pavel Emelyanov
2007-12-19 12:21 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-12-19 13:22 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-12-19 16:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-12-19 17:06 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-12-19 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-12-20 8:30 ` David Miller
2007-12-20 9:46 ` [PATCH net-2.6.25 (resend) " Pavel Emelyanov
2007-12-20 23:31 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47690CD1.9060502@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).