netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TCP] IPV6 : Change a divide into a right shift in tcp_v6_send_ack()
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:26:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <476BA2F8.1090102@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071221.155030.131184865.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <476B574E.80601@cosmosbay.com> (at Fri, 21 Dec 2007 07:03:58 +0100), Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> says:
> 
>> Because tot_len is signed in tcp_v6_send_ack(), tot_len/4 forces compiler
>> to emit an integer divide, while we can help it to use a right shift,
>> less expensive.
> 
> Are you really sure?
> At least, gcc-4.1.2-20061115 (debian) does not make any difference.

Quite true -- thus it is a matter of taste to the programmer.  Constant 
folding inside the compiler ensures that "foo / 4" asm output is just as 
optimal as a shift.


> And, IMHO, because shift for signed variable is fragile, so we should
> avoid using it.

I respectfully disagree, but this is an unrelated matter.  As you say, 
"/4" is fine as-is.

	Jeff



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-21 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-21  6:03 [TCP] IPV6 : Change a divide into a right shift in tcp_v6_send_ack() Eric Dumazet
2007-12-21  6:50 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-12-21  7:06   ` Eric Dumazet
     [not found]     ` <20071221.162833.82587283.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
2007-12-21  7:39       ` Eric Dumazet
2007-12-21  7:44         ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-12-21  7:50           ` Eric Dumazet
2007-12-21  9:46         ` David Miller
2007-12-21  8:11       ` Eric Dumazet
2007-12-21 11:26   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-12-21 11:57     ` David Miller
2007-12-21 12:18       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-12-21  7:21 ` Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=476BA2F8.1090102@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).