netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	tyasui@redhat.com, mhiramat@redhat.com,
	satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com, billfink@mindspring.com,
	andi@firstfloor.org, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
	shemminger@linux-foundation.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
	yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] [CORE]: datagram: basic memory accounting functions
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:22:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <476C58B3.8070301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071220.203105.209276041.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller wrote:
> From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:18:54 -0500
> 
>>> Also, the memory accounting is done at different parts in
>>> the socket code paths for stream vs. datagram.  This is why
>>> everything is inconsistent, and, a mess.
>> Could you tell me more detailed information?
> 
> I think the core thing is that TCP and INET protocols call into
> the memory accounting internally, either inside their own code
> paths or with inet_*() helpers.
> 
> This is versus what we really want is everything happening via generic
> sk_foo() helpers.
> 
> If that's what's happening already, great, just consolidate the
> datagram vs. stream stuff and it should be good.

Thank you for the explanation.

I'll do my best.

Regards,
Hideo

-- 
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-22  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-18  2:33 [PATCH 0/4] [UDP]: memory accounting and limitation (take 11) Hideo AOKI
2007-12-18  2:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] [UDP]: fix send buffer check Hideo AOKI
2007-12-20 11:31   ` David Miller
2007-12-21  3:43     ` Hideo AOKI
2007-12-18  2:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] [CORE]: datagram: basic memory accounting functions Hideo AOKI
2007-12-19  3:21   ` Hideo AOKI
2007-12-20 11:43   ` David Miller
2007-12-21  4:18     ` Hideo AOKI
2007-12-21  4:31       ` David Miller
2007-12-22  0:22         ` Hideo AOKI [this message]
2007-12-18  2:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] [UDP]: add udp_mem, udp_rmem_min and udp_wmem_min Hideo AOKI
2007-12-18  2:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] [UDP]: memory accounting in IPv4 Hideo AOKI
2007-12-20 11:44   ` David Miller
2007-12-21  3:58     ` Hideo AOKI

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=476C58B3.8070301@redhat.com \
    --to=haoki@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=billfink@mindspring.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tyasui@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).