From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: delay via-rhine irq initialisation.
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:36:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <476DD7CC.9090507@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071211233909.GA22470@redhat.com>
Dave Jones wrote:
> With CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ set, via-rhine complains during init.
> (See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=377721 for a report).
>
> Does this diff look right?
> (I don't have a via-rhine handy to test with)
>
> We may be able to get away with moving the request_irq to just after the
> alloc_tbufs(), but I feel if a real interrupt occured, this diff would
> stand more chance of doing the right thing.
>
> Comments?
>
> Dave
>
> Delay irq registration until after we've allocated ring buffers,
> otherwise DEBUG_SHIRQ will complain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
> index 07263cd..37b3efb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
> @@ -1151,24 +1151,28 @@ static int rhine_open(struct net_device *dev)
> void __iomem *ioaddr = rp->base;
> int rc;
>
> - rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
> - dev);
> - if (rc)
> - return rc;
> -
> if (debug > 1)
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: rhine_open() irq %d.\n",
> dev->name, rp->pdev->irq);
>
> rc = alloc_ring(dev);
> - if (rc) {
> - free_irq(rp->pdev->irq, dev);
> + if (rc)
> return rc;
> - }
> +
> alloc_rbufs(dev);
> alloc_tbufs(dev);
> rhine_chip_reset(dev);
> init_registers(dev);
> +
> + rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
> + dev);
> + if (rc) {
> + free_rbufs(dev);
> + free_tbufs(dev);
> + free_ring(dev);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
Absolutely we want to do this. DEBUG_SHIRQ is only one of many reasons
-- quite simply, you are fixing an order-of-init bug that leads to races
and other badness.
I would request that the error cleanup be done in the standard style for
net drivers (indeed, most drivers):
rc = request_irq(...);
if (rc)
goto err_out;
...
return 0;
err_out:
...
return rc;
Also I would change the subject to something like "fix order of init
bugs" or "fix races" or whatnot.
We must assume, when writing drivers, that an interrupt will be
delivered _immediately_ once request_irq() is called -- possibly even
before request_irq() has returned its return code.
Regards,
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-23 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-11 23:39 delay via-rhine irq initialisation Dave Jones
2007-12-23 3:36 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-01-02 23:34 ` Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=476DD7CC.9090507@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).