From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IPROUTE2] Compatibility with iptables 1.4.0 Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:59:09 +0100 Message-ID: <477233FD.2040502@netfilter.org> References: <20071224160739.M84357@visp.net.lb> <1198513837.4427.8.camel@localhost> <1198515457.4427.16.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Denys Fedoryshchenko , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:57629 "EHLO us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751991AbXLZLGK (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:06:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1198515457.4427.16.camel@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jamal, jamal wrote: > Pablo, below looks an oversight. > I think there are some libraries like the mark target need also to be > backward compatible. Shouldn't "mark" be in capital letters? >> lilsol:~# export IPTABLES_LIB_DIR=/root/iptables-1.4.0/extensions/ >> lilsol:~# tc actions add action ipt -j TOS --set-tos ^^^ this is OK >> lilsol:~# tc actions add action ipt -j mark --set-mark 3 ^^^ MARK I'm sorry for the breakage. We definitely need a library for iptables so this sort of stuff would not happen :( -- "Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers