From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, vladislav.yasevich@hp.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net,
tyasui@redhat.com, mhiramat@redhat.com,
satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com, billfink@mindspring.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com, haoki@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] New interface for memory accounting (take 1)
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:46:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47793923.7050003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071230.233413.117211235.davem@davemloft.net>
Hello David,
David Miller wrote:
> From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:47:33 -0500
>
>> The patch set consists of the following 4 patches.
>>
>> [1/4] introducing new memory accounting interface
>> [2/4] adding memory accounting points to consolidate functions
>> [3/4] updating TCP to use new interface
>> [4/4] updating SCTP to use new interface
>
> I like this work very much and will add this to net-2.6.25
> But I will have to combine it all into one patch.
>
> You cannot have one patch which breaks the build in any way. All of
> the kernel must build properly after each patch in your patchset is
> applied.
>
> Since patch 1 renames all of the sk_stream_*() functions, TCP and SCTP
> stop building.
That's correct.
> We enforce this rule, otherwise when users try to use "git bisect" to
> find out where regressions are added, they will get stuck in places
> like this where the tree will not build due to such careless
> changesets.
Thank you for your explanation. To be honest, I didn't know the rule
exactly. I am so sorry for sending inconvenient patch set.
Best regards,
Hideo
--
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-31 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-30 8:47 [PATCH 0/4] New interface for memory accounting (take 1) Hideo AOKI
2007-12-30 8:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] [CORE]: introducing new memory accounting interface Hideo AOKI
2007-12-30 8:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] [CORE]: adding memory accounting points Hideo AOKI
2007-12-31 7:58 ` David Miller
2007-12-31 18:52 ` Hideo AOKI
2007-12-30 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] [TCP]: using new interface Hideo AOKI
2007-12-30 8:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] [SCTP]: " Hideo AOKI
2007-12-31 7:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] New interface for memory accounting (take 1) David Miller
2007-12-31 15:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-12-31 19:03 ` Hideo AOKI
2007-12-31 23:01 ` David Miller
2007-12-31 18:46 ` Hideo AOKI [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47793923.7050003@redhat.com \
--to=haoki@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=billfink@mindspring.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tyasui@redhat.com \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).