Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 01 January 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> The kernel __GLIBC__ hacks were re-added so as to appease klibc people, >>> but the klibc people didnt actually fix the problem on their side. This >>> patch imports the structures/defines that klibc seems to need. Build >>> tested on x86_64 (i dont actually use klibc so no idea how to test it). >> The whole point was to NOT need to replicate all these structures and >> constants, which are part of the ABI, in klibc... > > then figure out a way that doesnt make the kernel headers blow for everyone > else out there. change the __GLIBC__ crap to __KLIBC__ or something. Seems the most logical thing to do would be to break out the small portion that everyone wants into or somesuch, and then remove those ifdefs entirely. Proposed patch (still being tested) attached... -hpa