From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: Top 10 kernel oopses for the week ending January 5th, 2008 Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:05:00 -0800 Message-ID: <4783C95C.7050303@linux.intel.com> References: <477FF149.4070609@linux.intel.com> <20080105213935.GN27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20080107174431.GC27741@fieldses.org> <4782CF9C.6000508@gmail.com> <20080108081401.d9576ac5.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <4783B602.1050307@linux.intel.com> <4783BE06.1070507@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Randy Dunlap , Kevin Winchester , "J. Bruce Fields" , Al Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , NetDev To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:3575 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751505AbYAHTHl (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:07:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> the database has the information so it's just a matter of slightly different >> php code ;) >> Before I do that... do you want the BUG's separate, part of the warnings or >> part of the oopses? >> (I rather make this change once ;) > > I'd like them all separate, they tend to be very different and contain > different information. > > Put the warnings last, as the least important. Oopses at the top, since > they tend to be the ones that are less expected. ok done; I had to fizzle a bit because some things aren't *exactly* a BUG() statement but I track them anyway (things like the "sleeping in invalid context" check), so I had to somewhat arbitrarily assign categories for those. I might fine tune these over time some; if you or someone else sees problems with categorization please let me know