From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: make ipv6_sysctl_register to return a value Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:56:48 +0100 Message-ID: <47849A60.1020909@fr.ibm.com> References: <47828DEB.9070301@fr.ibm.com> <20080109.002632.136758957.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.153]:40998 "EHLO mtagate4.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752225AbYAIKGO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:06:14 -0500 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m09A6C8e180102 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:06:13 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m09A6CdV2699518 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:06:12 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m09A6Cn2008205 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:06:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20080109.002632.136758957.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > Why did you post this again? It's identical to patch 1/9 > from the previous series you sent out. > > This is confusing, since it makes me think you wanted me to > perhaps do something different or update an already > submitted patch. I thought you was expecting a new netns ipv6 sysctl series and ignored the current one. While I was looking at them again I found a problem and I wanted to fix that before resending. In the meantime, there were three independant trivial patches I wanted to send as a pre-requesite for the incoming sysctl patches. Bad idea ... :) - make ipv6_sysctl_register to return a value - make a subsystem for af_inet6 - add ipv6 structure for netns With the sysctl Pavel's patch, the first one does not apply. To clear out any confusion, please can you just ignore all my previous patches, I will resend a new serie rebased on the work done by Pavel. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks. -- Daniel