netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e1000 performance issue in 4 simultaneous links
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:26:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4786633C.6000308@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199981839.8931.35.camel@cafe>

Many many things to check when running netperf :)

*) Are the cards on the same or separate PCImumble bus, and what sort of bus

*) is the two interface performance two interfaces on the same four-port 
card, or an interface from each of the two four-port cards?

*) is there a dreaded (IMO) irqbalance daemon running?  one of the very 
first things I do when running netperf is terminate the irqbalance 
daemon with as extreme a predjudice as I can.

*) what is the distribution of interrupts from the interfaces to the 
CPUs?  if you've tried to set that manually, the dreaded irqbalance 
daemon will come along shortly thereafter and ruin everything.

*) what does netperf say about the overall CPU utilization of the 
system(s) when the tests are running?

*) what does top say about the utilization of any single CPU in the 
system(s) when the tests are running?

*) are you using the global -T option to spread the netperf/netserver 
processes across the CPUs, or leaving that all up to the 
stack/scheduler/etc?

I suspect there could be more but that is what comes to mind thusfar as 
far as things I often check when running netperf.

rick jones


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-10 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-10 16:17 e1000 performance issue in 4 simultaneous links Breno Leitao
2008-01-10 16:36 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-01-10 16:51   ` Jeba Anandhan
2008-01-10 17:31   ` Breno Leitao
2008-01-10 18:18     ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-10 18:37     ` Rick Jones
2008-01-10 18:26 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2008-01-10 20:52 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-01-11  1:28   ` David Miller
2008-01-11 11:09     ` Benny Amorsen
2008-01-12  1:41       ` David Miller
2008-01-12  5:13         ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-01-30 16:57           ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-11 16:20   ` Breno Leitao
2008-01-11 16:48     ` Eric Dumazet
2008-01-11 17:36       ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-01-11 18:45         ` Breno Leitao
2008-01-11 18:19       ` Breno Leitao
2008-01-11 18:48         ` Rick Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4786633C.6000308@hp.com \
    --to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).