netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore.
@ 2008-01-14 14:04 Denis V. Lunev
  2008-01-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2 net-2.6.25] [NETNS] Process inet_confirm_addr in the correct namespace Denis V. Lunev
  2008-01-14 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore David Miller
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis V. Lunev @ 2008-01-14 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem; +Cc: netdev, devel, Denis V. Lunev

arp_ignore has two arguments: dev & in_dev. dev is used for inet_confirm_addr
calling only.

inet_confirm_addr, in turn, either gets in_dev from the device passed or
iterates over all network devices if the device passed is NULL. It seems
logical to directly pass in_dev into inet_confirm_addr.

Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
---
 include/linux/inetdevice.h |    2 +-
 net/ipv4/arp.c             |   11 +++++------
 net/ipv4/devinet.c         |   17 ++++++-----------
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/inetdevice.h b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
index b3c5081..45f3731 100644
--- a/include/linux/inetdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ extern int		devinet_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, void __user *);
 extern void		devinet_init(void);
 extern struct in_device	*inetdev_by_index(int);
 extern __be32		inet_select_addr(const struct net_device *dev, __be32 dst, int scope);
-extern __be32		inet_confirm_addr(const struct net_device *dev, __be32 dst, __be32 local, int scope);
+extern __be32		inet_confirm_addr(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 dst, __be32 local, int scope);
 extern struct in_ifaddr *inet_ifa_byprefix(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 prefix, __be32 mask);
 
 static __inline__ int inet_ifa_match(__be32 addr, struct in_ifaddr *ifa)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
index e944d98..f38e1a9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
@@ -382,8 +382,7 @@ static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		read_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
 }
 
-static int arp_ignore(struct in_device *in_dev, struct net_device *dev,
-		      __be32 sip, __be32 tip)
+static int arp_ignore(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 sip, __be32 tip)
 {
 	int scope;
 
@@ -403,7 +402,7 @@ static int arp_ignore(struct in_device *in_dev, struct net_device *dev,
 	case 3:	/* Do not reply for scope host addresses */
 		sip = 0;
 		scope = RT_SCOPE_LINK;
-		dev = NULL;
+		in_dev = NULL;
 		break;
 	case 4:	/* Reserved */
 	case 5:
@@ -415,7 +414,7 @@ static int arp_ignore(struct in_device *in_dev, struct net_device *dev,
 	default:
 		return 0;
 	}
-	return !inet_confirm_addr(dev, sip, tip, scope);
+	return !inet_confirm_addr(in_dev, sip, tip, scope);
 }
 
 static int arp_filter(__be32 sip, __be32 tip, struct net_device *dev)
@@ -807,7 +806,7 @@ static int arp_process(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (sip == 0) {
 		if (arp->ar_op == htons(ARPOP_REQUEST) &&
 		    inet_addr_type(&init_net, tip) == RTN_LOCAL &&
-		    !arp_ignore(in_dev,dev,sip,tip))
+		    !arp_ignore(in_dev, sip, tip))
 			arp_send(ARPOP_REPLY, ETH_P_ARP, sip, dev, tip, sha,
 				 dev->dev_addr, sha);
 		goto out;
@@ -825,7 +824,7 @@ static int arp_process(struct sk_buff *skb)
 				int dont_send = 0;
 
 				if (!dont_send)
-					dont_send |= arp_ignore(in_dev,dev,sip,tip);
+					dont_send |= arp_ignore(in_dev,sip,tip);
 				if (!dont_send && IN_DEV_ARPFILTER(in_dev))
 					dont_send |= arp_filter(sip,tip,dev);
 				if (!dont_send)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
index 03db15b..dc1665a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -968,24 +968,19 @@ static __be32 confirm_addr_indev(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 dst,
 
 /*
  * Confirm that local IP address exists using wildcards:
- * - dev: only on this interface, 0=any interface
+ * - in_dev: only on this interface, 0=any interface
  * - dst: only in the same subnet as dst, 0=any dst
  * - local: address, 0=autoselect the local address
  * - scope: maximum allowed scope value for the local address
  */
-__be32 inet_confirm_addr(const struct net_device *dev, __be32 dst, __be32 local, int scope)
+__be32 inet_confirm_addr(struct in_device *in_dev,
+			 __be32 dst, __be32 local, int scope)
 {
 	__be32 addr = 0;
-	struct in_device *in_dev;
-
-	if (dev) {
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		if ((in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev)))
-			addr = confirm_addr_indev(in_dev, dst, local, scope);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
+	struct net_device *dev;
 
-		return addr;
-	}
+	if (in_dev != NULL)
+		return confirm_addr_indev(in_dev, dst, local, scope);
 
 	read_lock(&dev_base_lock);
 	rcu_read_lock();
-- 
1.5.3.rc5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2 net-2.6.25] [NETNS] Process inet_confirm_addr in the correct namespace.
  2008-01-14 14:04 [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore Denis V. Lunev
@ 2008-01-14 14:04 ` Denis V. Lunev
  2008-01-14 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore David Miller
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis V. Lunev @ 2008-01-14 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem; +Cc: netdev, devel, Denis V. Lunev

inet_confirm_addr can be called with NULL in_dev from arp_ignore iff
scope is RT_SCOPE_LINK.

Lets always pass the device and check for RT_SCOPE_LINK scope inside
inet_confirm_addr. This let us take network namespace from in_device a
need for an additional argument.

Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
---
 net/ipv4/arp.c     |    1 -
 net/ipv4/devinet.c |    6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
index f38e1a9..b715ec0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
@@ -402,7 +400,6 @@ static int arp_ignore(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 sip, __be32 tip)
 	case 3:	/* Do not reply for scope host addresses */
 		sip = 0;
 		scope = RT_SCOPE_LINK;
-		in_dev = NULL;
 		break;
 	case 4:	/* Reserved */
 	case 5:
diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
index dc1665a..4569c69 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -978,13 +978,15 @@ __be32 inet_confirm_addr(struct in_device *in_dev,
 {
 	__be32 addr = 0;
 	struct net_device *dev;
+	struct net *net;
 
-	if (in_dev != NULL)
+	if (scope != RT_SCOPE_LINK)
 		return confirm_addr_indev(in_dev, dst, local, scope);
 
+	net = in_dev->dev->nd_net;
 	read_lock(&dev_base_lock);
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) {
+	for_each_netdev(net, dev) {
 		if ((in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev))) {
 			addr = confirm_addr_indev(in_dev, dst, local, scope);
 			if (addr)
-- 
1.5.3.rc5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore.
  2008-01-14 14:04 [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore Denis V. Lunev
  2008-01-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2 net-2.6.25] [NETNS] Process inet_confirm_addr in the correct namespace Denis V. Lunev
@ 2008-01-14 14:37 ` David Miller
  2008-01-14 14:43   ` Denis V. Lunev
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-01-14 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: den; +Cc: netdev, devel


This patch series is numbered, but your other patch series sent a few
moments ago had no sequence numbers in the subject lines or changelog.

How can I know what order to apply those in and do they need to go in
before or after this set?

I shouldn't have to ask questions like this, so please help avoid
confusion of this nature in the future.

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore.
  2008-01-14 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore David Miller
@ 2008-01-14 14:43   ` Denis V. Lunev
  2008-01-14 14:49     ` Denis V. Lunev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis V. Lunev @ 2008-01-14 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: den, netdev, devel

David Miller wrote:
> This patch series is numbered, but your other patch series sent a few
> moments ago had no sequence numbers in the subject lines or changelog.
> 
> How can I know what order to apply those in and do they need to go in
> before or after this set?
> 
> I shouldn't have to ask questions like this, so please help avoid
> confusion of this nature in the future.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

non-numbered patches do not intersect with each other.

numbered ones depends on each other but not from the rest.

Sorry for inconvenience :(

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore.
  2008-01-14 14:43   ` Denis V. Lunev
@ 2008-01-14 14:49     ` Denis V. Lunev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis V. Lunev @ 2008-01-14 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev, devel

Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> This patch series is numbered, but your other patch series sent a few
>> moments ago had no sequence numbers in the subject lines or changelog.
>>
>> How can I know what order to apply those in and do they need to go in
>> before or after this set?
>>
>> I shouldn't have to ask questions like this, so please help avoid
>> confusion of this nature in the future.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> 
> non-numbered patches do not intersect with each other.
> 
> numbered ones depends on each other but not from the rest.
> 
> Sorry for inconvenience :(

I'll resend them for you convenience. Sorry again, I forget that git
checks indexes and this can be a problem.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-14 14:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-14 14:04 [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore Denis V. Lunev
2008-01-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2 net-2.6.25] [NETNS] Process inet_confirm_addr in the correct namespace Denis V. Lunev
2008-01-14 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore David Miller
2008-01-14 14:43   ` Denis V. Lunev
2008-01-14 14:49     ` Denis V. Lunev

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).