From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Denis V. Lunev" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-2.6.25] [IPV4] Remove extra argument from arp_ignore. Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:43:25 +0300 Message-ID: <478B750D.6060407@sw.ru> References: <1200319481-18459-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> <20080114.063753.42458530.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: den@openvz.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from swsoft-msk-nat.sw.ru ([195.214.232.10]:60979 "EHLO iris.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753161AbYANOn0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:43:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080114.063753.42458530.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > This patch series is numbered, but your other patch series sent a few > moments ago had no sequence numbers in the subject lines or changelog. > > How can I know what order to apply those in and do they need to go in > before or after this set? > > I shouldn't have to ask questions like this, so please help avoid > confusion of this nature in the future. > > Thanks. > non-numbered patches do not intersect with each other. numbered ones depends on each other but not from the rest. Sorry for inconvenience :(