From: Mark Seger <Mark.Seger@hp.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why are network counters only updated once a second?
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:00:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <478BCD6B.4020009@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478BC9ED.2000204@cosmosbay.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Mark Seger a écrit :
>> I had mentioned this in my previous post but perhaps it might get
>> more attention all by itself. I can't say for sure when this
>> changed, but for the longest time network counters were only updated
>> once every 0.9765 seconds and unless you used a tools like collectl
>> that could monitor at fractional intervals, your traffic was
>> under-reported AND you'd get periodic spikes of double the actual
>> rate. See http://collectl.sourceforge.net/NetworkStats.html for a
>> more complete explanation.
>>
>> Eventually the frequency became better aligned at a 1 second interval
>> because now the number look better, but the problem I see is that
>> when the sampling interval is very close to the monitoring interval
>> you still get periodic incorrect data. Furthermore, you now need to
>> know which way the counters are updated before you pick a sampling
>> interval! But the real point is if anyone ever wants to do finer
>> grained monitoring, say every 1/2 or even tenth of a second, they
>> can't because the counters won't change between samples. Has this
>> ever been discussed before?
>>
>
> Yes it was discussed before. Some devices perform counters updates
> directly at the NIC level, and one in a while a transfert of counters
> is done to the host.
>
> This is supposed to be better, especially on SMP.
>
> Maybe you need to setup accounting rules with iptables, so that you
> can perform counter sampling at whatever rate you want ?
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I'm grabbing the counters from
/proc/net/dev and whatever mechanism is being used only ports them with
a granularity of about once a second. This means any of the standard
tools that use /proc to get their data will all have the same problem.
-mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-14 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-14 20:30 Why are network counters only updated once a second? Mark Seger
2008-01-14 20:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-01-14 21:00 ` Mark Seger [this message]
2008-01-14 22:31 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=478BCD6B.4020009@hp.com \
--to=mark.seger@hp.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).