From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@bigtelecom.ru>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Packetlost when "tc qdisc del dev eth0 root"
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:02:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <478D8FC8.9000107@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478D226E.1050209@gmail.com>
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote, On 01/15/2008 05:05 PM:
>
>> Badalian Vyacheslav wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Yes, packets in the old qdisc are lost.
>>
>>> Maybe if tc do changes - need create second queue (hash of rules or how
>>> you named it?) and do changes at it. Then replace old queue rules by
>>> created new.
>>> Logic -
>>> 1. Do snapshot
>>> 2. Do changes in shapshot
>>> 3. All new packets go to snapshot
>>> 4. If old queue not have packets - delete it.
>>> 5. Snapshot its default.
>>
>> That doesn't really work since qdiscs keep internal state that
>> in large parts depends on the packets queued. Take the qlen as
>> a simple example, the new qdisc doesn't know about the packets
>> in the old one and will exceed the limit.
>
> But, some similar alternative to killing packets 'to death' could
> be imagined, I suppose (in the future, of course!). So, e.g. doing
> the switch automatically after last packet has been dequeued (maybe
> even with some 'special' function/mode for this). After all even
> with accuracy lost, it could be less visible for clients than
> current way?
This would need support from the qdiscs to do it properly. Looks
non-trivial for HTB/HFSC/CBQ, but the others shouldn't be that hard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-16 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-15 11:10 Packetlost when "tc qdisc del dev eth0 root" Badalian Vyacheslav
2008-01-15 16:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-01-15 16:11 ` slavon
2008-01-15 21:15 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-15 21:46 ` slavon
2008-01-15 22:04 ` slavon
2008-01-15 22:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-16 5:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-01-19 23:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-15 22:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-15 23:16 ` Glen Turner
2008-01-16 5:02 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-01-16 8:02 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-16 8:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-01-16 8:35 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2008-01-16 9:42 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-16 8:52 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-16 8:54 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=478D8FC8.9000107@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slavon@bigtelecom.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).