From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:38:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <478F05E7.6070503@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080116.231654.74131878.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Timo_Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>
> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:27:14 +0200
>
>> I don't know about netlink. But pfkey works in *BSD too and it is RFC'd.
>> So I'd say pfkey might be a bit more portable. Though netlink is definitely
>> more robust and extensive.
>
> The RFCs say absolutely nothing about policy interfaces for AF_KEY,
> everybody rolls their own in slightly incompatible ways.
>
> It is therefore anything but standardized.
Yes, there's non-standardized extensions. But the point was that there are
other implementations of pfkey. And ipsec-tools racoon is an example of
a widely used application that runs in Linux and *BSD using this API. So
for the time being I'd consider having pfkey fixes as a good thing. This
pfkey dumping problem seems to be affecting many users.
- Timo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-17 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-13 12:26 [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key Timo Teräs
2008-01-16 13:52 ` jamal
2008-01-16 14:28 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 1:25 ` jamal
2008-01-16 22:58 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 1:39 ` jamal
2008-01-17 2:17 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 5:54 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 11:11 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 12:21 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 12:26 ` jamal
2008-01-17 12:42 ` jamal
2008-01-17 12:50 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 13:18 ` jamal
2008-01-17 13:31 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 21:34 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-18 6:45 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-18 14:08 ` jamal
2008-01-17 6:27 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 7:16 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 7:38 ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2008-01-17 7:59 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 8:11 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 8:49 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 9:20 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 9:31 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 9:38 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 9:44 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 10:01 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 10:06 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 11:00 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 11:08 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 12:37 ` Timo Teräs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=478F05E7.6070503@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).