From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Ivan Dichev <idichev@obs.bg>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow OOM in netif_RX function
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:12:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4798E32E.6080003@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4798CAA9.1080005@obs.bg>
Ivan Dichev a écrit :
> Hello,
> I got problem with my linux router. It has slow persistent OOM
> problems from few months ago.
> Every working(I mean days when more traffic is generated) day my
> router is leaking with 15-20 MB memory and
> after 2 weeks the restart is a MUST.
>>From /proc/slabinfo I saw that size-2048 and size-512 are growing
> rapidly every day when traffic occur.
>
> --------- /proc/slabinfo --------------------
> size-2048 20322 20349 2072 3 2 : tunables 24
> 12 0 : slabdata 6780 6783 0
> size-512 50984 51016 536 7 1 : tunables 32
> 16 0 : slabdata 7288 7288 0
>
>
> I was wondering who is allocating this mem pools and then I changed
> the kernel with 2.6.23-rc12 including options
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK=y
>
>
> Unfortunately changing the kernel didn't solve the mem leak....
> Now /proc/slab_allocators is showing that 3c59x driver is allocating
> 2048 and 512 bytes memory pools
> caused by RX function.
> --------- from /proc/slab_allocators ------------------------------
> 7612 size-2048: boomerang_rx+0x33b/0x437 [3c59x]
> 16018 size-512: boomerang_rx+0x165/0x437 [3c59x]
>
> I was thinking that the 3com driver is bogus, .. but not!
> After few days I changed the cards with rtl8139 and now ....
> --------- from /proc/slab_allocators ------------------------------
> size-2048: 20159 rtl8139_rx+0x155/0x2dc [8139too]
> size-1024: 2693 rtl8139_rx+0x155/0x2dc [8139too]
> size-512: 50515 rtl8139_rx+0x155/0x2dc [8139too]
>
> the memory leak appear again in the same function(RX).
>
> I did search over the mailing list and found as similar only this
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/old/2003-q4/msg03071.html
>
>
> For sure it does not depend on kernel version and network
> driver(except case if both drivers are bogus :)
> Any ideas ?
>
Could you post your iptable rules "iptables -t nat -nvL ; iptables -nvL", and
full "cat /proc/slabinfo" ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-24 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-24 17:28 Slow OOM in netif_RX function Ivan Dichev
2008-01-24 18:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-01-24 19:12 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-01-24 21:18 ` Ivan H. Dichev
2008-01-24 21:51 ` Francois Romieu
2008-01-25 13:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-25 14:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-02-01 12:51 ` Ivan Dichev
2008-02-01 13:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-02-01 15:38 ` Ivan Dichev
2008-02-04 14:54 ` Ivan Dichev
2008-02-04 15:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-05 9:04 ` Ivan Mitev
2008-02-01 14:29 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4798E32E.6080003@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=idichev@obs.bg \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).