netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/1] Deprecate tcp_tw_{reuse,recycle}
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:37:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A16CBB.3000409@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801310359.07362.ak@suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 January 2008 20:22, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>   
>> We use these features to enable creating very high numbers of short-lived
>> TCP connections, primarily used as a test tool for other network
>> devices.
>>     
>
> Hopefully these other network devices don't do any NAT then
> or don't otherwise violate the IP-matches-PAWS assumption.
> Most likely they do actually, so enabling TW recycle
> for testing is probably not even safe for you.
>
> Modern systems have a lot of RAM so even without tw recycle
> you should be able to get a very high number of connections.
> An timewait socket is around 128 bytes on 64bit; this means
> with a GB of memory you can already support > 8 Million TW sockets.
> On 32bit it's even more.
>   
I believe the problem was that all of my ports were used up with
TIME_WAIT sockets and so it couldn't create more.  My test
case was similar to this:

1 Have one machine B listen for connections on one interface (one IP).
2 Have one machine A make a connection to B, and close connection 
immediately or soon after
  it was established.
goto 2

The goal was to make a maximum number of TCP connections per second.  
The data passed
is just filler, and for the fastest settings, we don't pass data at all. 
  Without setting
tcp_tw_recycle to 1, the system could do only a few thousand connections 
per second.  With
it set to 1, I think I was getting around 10,000.  Either way, it was 
significantly faster than
w/out recycle enabled.

So, is there a better way to max out the connections per second without 
having to use tcp_tw_recycle?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> 
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com



  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-31  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-30  8:38 [PATCH] [1/1] Deprecate tcp_tw_{reuse,recycle} Andi Kleen
2008-01-30 19:22 ` Ben Greear
2008-01-31  2:59   ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31  6:37     ` Ben Greear [this message]
2008-01-31  6:55       ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31 16:41         ` Ben Greear
2008-01-31 16:49           ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47A16CBB.3000409@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).