From: Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: Bruce Allen <ballen@gravity.phys.uwm.edu>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Henning Fehrmann <henning.fehrmann@aei.mpg.de>,
Bruce Allen <bruce.allen@aei.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:18:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A1E6C7.4020902@aei.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52044F8BA3@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
Brief question I forgot to ask:
Right now we are using the "old" version 7.3.20-k2. To save some effort
on your end, shall we upgrade this to 7.6.15 or should our version be
good enough?
Thanks
Carsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 12:23 e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed Bruce Allen
2008-01-30 17:36 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-01-30 18:45 ` Rick Jones
2008-01-30 23:15 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 11:35 ` Carsten Aulbert
2008-01-31 17:55 ` Rick Jones
2008-02-01 19:57 ` Carsten Aulbert
2008-01-30 23:07 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 5:43 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-01-31 8:31 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 18:08 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-31 18:38 ` Rick Jones
2008-01-31 18:47 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-31 19:07 ` Rick Jones
2008-01-31 19:13 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 19:32 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-31 19:48 ` Bruce Allen
2008-02-01 6:27 ` Bill Fink
2008-02-01 7:54 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 15:12 ` Carsten Aulbert
2008-01-31 17:20 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-01-31 17:27 ` Carsten Aulbert
2008-01-31 17:33 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-01-31 18:11 ` running aggregate netperf TCP_RR " Rick Jones
2008-01-31 18:03 ` Rick Jones
2008-01-31 15:18 ` Carsten Aulbert [this message]
2008-01-31 9:17 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31 9:59 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 16:09 ` Carsten Aulbert
2008-01-31 18:15 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-30 19:17 ` Ben Greear
2008-01-30 22:33 ` Bruce Allen
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.63.0801300324000.6391@trinity.phys.uwm.edu>
2008-01-30 13:53 ` David Miller
2008-01-30 14:01 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-30 16:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-01-30 22:25 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-30 22:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-01-30 23:23 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 0:17 ` SANGTAE HA
2008-01-31 8:52 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 11:45 ` Bill Fink
2008-01-31 14:50 ` David Acker
2008-01-31 15:57 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 15:54 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 17:36 ` Bill Fink
2008-01-31 19:37 ` Bruce Allen
2008-01-31 18:26 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A1E6C7.4020902@aei.mpg.de \
--to=carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
--cc=ballen@gravity.phys.uwm.edu \
--cc=bruce.allen@aei.mpg.de \
--cc=henning.fehrmann@aei.mpg.de \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).