From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Aulbert Subject: Re: e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:27:01 +0100 Message-ID: <47A204E5.7060406@aei.mpg.de> References: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52044F81DF@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52044F8BA3@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> <47A1E553.8010006@aei.mpg.de> <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52044F8EC9@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bruce Allen , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Henning Fehrmann , Bruce Allen To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" Return-path: Received: from welcomes-you.com ([85.214.50.128]:55915 "EHLO welcomes-you.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756136AbYAaR1M (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:27:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52044F8EC9@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi all, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: >>> I would suggest you try TCP_RR with a command line something like >>> this: netperf -t TCP_RR -H -C -c -- -b 4 -r 64K >> I did that and the results can be found here: >> https://n0.aei.uni-hannover.de/wiki/index.php/NetworkTest > > seems something went wrong and all you ran was the 1 byte tests, where > it should have been 64K both directions (request/response). > Yes, shell-quoting got me there. I'll re-run the tests, so please don't look at the TCP_RR results too closely. I think I'll be able to run maybe one or two more tests today, rest will follow tomorrow. Thanks for bearing with me Carsten PS: Am I right that the TCP_RR tests should only be run on a single node at a time, not on both ends simultaneously?