From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Still oopsing in nf_nat_move_storage()
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:03:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A20D57.5040907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <479F5FDC.5040903@trash.net>
On 01/29/2008 12:18 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> nf_nat_move_storage():
>> /usr/src/debug/kernel-2.6.23/linux-2.6.23.i686/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:612
>>
>> 87: f7 47 64 80 01 00 00 testl $0x180,0x64(%edi)
>> 8e: 74 39 je c9
>> <nf_nat_move_storage+0x65>
>>
>> line 612:
>> if (!(ct->status & IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK))
>> return;
>>
>> ct is NULL
>
> The current kernel (and 2.6.23-stable) have:
>
> if (!ct || !(ct->status & IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK))
> return;
>
> so it seems you're using an old version.
Sorry, I re-used the analysis from before that change went in. I now
have an oops report from 2.6.23.14 on x86_64.
It is oopsing there, and only on x86_64 now, because x86_64 refuses to
use a non-canonical address. ct contains what appears to be ASCII data.
i386 might be dereferencing some random address instead of oopsing...
0: 48 f7 45 78 80 01 00 testq $0x180,0x78(%rbp)
7: 00
8: 74 4c je 0x56
a: 48 c7 c7 e0 18 28 88 mov $0xffffffff882818e0,%rdi
%rbp has a bogus (non-canonical) address. On i386 there is no such test possible
so it will just dereference the address if it is mapped.
%rbp contains 8 valid ASCII chars: "salcf x\"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-29 17:11 Still oopsing in nf_nat_move_storage() Chuck Ebbert
2008-01-29 17:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-01-31 18:03 ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2008-02-01 23:41 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-02-02 10:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-02-02 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-02-05 16:26 ` Thomas Woerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A20D57.5040907@redhat.com \
--to=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).