From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:07:31 -0800 Message-ID: <47A21C73.4070301@hp.com> References: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52044F81DF@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52044F8BA3@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> <47A20E9E.7070503@intel.com> <47A215A8.2090104@hp.com> <47A217CE.4000002@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bruce Allen , "Brandeburg, Jesse" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Carsten Aulbert , Henning Fehrmann , Bruce Allen To: "Kok, Auke" Return-path: Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:42109 "EHLO g1t0026.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754100AbYAaTHd (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:07:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47A217CE.4000002@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >>Sounds like tools to show PCI* bus utilization would be helpful... > > > that would be a hardware profiling thing and highly dependent on the part sticking > out of the slot, vendor bus implementation etc... Perhaps Intel has some tools for > this already but I personally do not know of any :/ Small matter of getting specs for the various LBA's (is that the correct term? - lower bus adaptors) and then abstracting them a la the CPU perf counters as done by say perfmon and then used by papi :) rick jones