From: Ivan Dichev <idichev@obs.bg>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow OOM in netif_RX function
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:51:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A315DC.3070101@obs.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080125141204.GA25510@ghostprotocols.net>
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 02:21:08PM +0100, Andi Kleen escreveu:
>
>> "Ivan H. Dichev" <idichev@obs.bg> writes:
>>
>>> What could happen if I put different Lan card in every slot?
>>> In ex. to-private -> 3com
>>> to-inet -> VIA
>>> to-dmz -> rtl8139
>>> And then to look which RX function is consuming the memory.
>>> (boomerang_rx, rtl8139_rx, ... etc)
>>>
>> The problem is unlikely to be in the driver (these are both
>> well tested ones) but more likely your complicated iptables setup somehow
>> triggers a skb leak.
>>
>> There are unfortunately no shrink wrapped debug mechanisms in the kernel
>> for leaks like this (ok you could enable CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG
>> and see if it prints something interesting, but that's a long shot).
>>
>> If you wanted to write a custom debugging patch I would do something like this:
>>
>> - Add two new integer fields to struct sk_buff: a time stamp and a integer field
>> - Fill the time stamp with jiffies in alloc_skb and clear the integer field
>> - In __kfree_skb clear the time stamp
>> - For all the ipt target modules in net/ipv4/netfilter/*.c you use change their
>> ->target functions to put an unique value into the integer field you added.
>> - Do the same for the pkt_to_tuple functions for all conntrack modules
>>
>> Then when you observe the leak take a crash dump using kdump on the router
>> and then use crash to dump all the slab objects for the sk_head_cache.
>> Then look for any that have an old time stamp and check what value they
>> have in the integer field. Then the netfilter function who set that unique value
>> likely triggered the leak somehow.
>>
>
> I wrote some systemtap scripts that do parts of what you suggest, and at
> least for the timestamp there was no need to add a new field to struct
> sk_buff, I just reuse skb->timestamp, as it is only used when we use a
> packet sniffer. Here it is for reference, but it needs some tapsets I
> wrote, so I'll publish this git repo in git.kernel.org, perhaps it can
> be useful in this case as a starting point. Find another unused field
> (hint: I know that at least 4 bytes on 64 bits is present as a hole) and
> you're done, no need to rebuild the kernel :)
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/nettaps.git
>
> - Arnaldo
>
Thanks to everyone for the given ideas.
I am not kernel guru so writing patch is difficult. This is a production
server and it is quite difficult to debug (only at night)
I removed some iptables exotics - recent , ulog, string , but no effect.
Since we can reach OOM most of the memory is going to be filled with the
leak, and we are thinking to try to dump and analyze it.
We have looked at the "crash" tool, and we will see what we can do with
it. Meanwhile do you have any hint/ideas ?
Thanks a lot.
Ivan Dichev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-01 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-24 17:28 Slow OOM in netif_RX function Ivan Dichev
2008-01-24 18:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-01-24 19:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-01-24 21:18 ` Ivan H. Dichev
2008-01-24 21:51 ` Francois Romieu
2008-01-25 13:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-25 14:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-02-01 12:51 ` Ivan Dichev [this message]
2008-02-01 13:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-02-01 15:38 ` Ivan Dichev
2008-02-04 14:54 ` Ivan Dichev
2008-02-04 15:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-05 9:04 ` Ivan Mitev
2008-02-01 14:29 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A315DC.3070101@obs.bg \
--to=idichev@obs.bg \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).