From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Ivan Dichev <idichev@obs.bg>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow OOM in netif_RX function
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:16:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A31BBA.8040307@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47A315DC.3070101@obs.bg>
Ivan Dichev a écrit :
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
>> Em Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 02:21:08PM +0100, Andi Kleen escreveu:
>>
>>
>>> "Ivan H. Dichev" <idichev@obs.bg> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>> What could happen if I put different Lan card in every slot?
>>>> In ex. to-private -> 3com
>>>> to-inet -> VIA
>>>> to-dmz -> rtl8139
>>>> And then to look which RX function is consuming the memory.
>>>> (boomerang_rx, rtl8139_rx, ... etc)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The problem is unlikely to be in the driver (these are both
>>> well tested ones) but more likely your complicated iptables setup somehow
>>> triggers a skb leak.
>>>
>>> There are unfortunately no shrink wrapped debug mechanisms in the kernel
>>> for leaks like this (ok you could enable CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG
>>> and see if it prints something interesting, but that's a long shot).
>>>
>>> If you wanted to write a custom debugging patch I would do something like this:
>>>
>>> - Add two new integer fields to struct sk_buff: a time stamp and a integer field
>>> - Fill the time stamp with jiffies in alloc_skb and clear the integer field
>>> - In __kfree_skb clear the time stamp
>>> - For all the ipt target modules in net/ipv4/netfilter/*.c you use change their
>>> ->target functions to put an unique value into the integer field you added.
>>> - Do the same for the pkt_to_tuple functions for all conntrack modules
>>>
>>> Then when you observe the leak take a crash dump using kdump on the router
>>> and then use crash to dump all the slab objects for the sk_head_cache.
>>> Then look for any that have an old time stamp and check what value they
>>> have in the integer field. Then the netfilter function who set that unique value
>>> likely triggered the leak somehow.
>>>
>>>
>> I wrote some systemtap scripts that do parts of what you suggest, and at
>> least for the timestamp there was no need to add a new field to struct
>> sk_buff, I just reuse skb->timestamp, as it is only used when we use a
>> packet sniffer. Here it is for reference, but it needs some tapsets I
>> wrote, so I'll publish this git repo in git.kernel.org, perhaps it can
>> be useful in this case as a starting point. Find another unused field
>> (hint: I know that at least 4 bytes on 64 bits is present as a hole) and
>> you're done, no need to rebuild the kernel :)
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/nettaps.git
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>>
>>
> Thanks to everyone for the given ideas.
> I am not kernel guru so writing patch is difficult. This is a production
> server and it is quite difficult to debug (only at night)
> I removed some iptables exotics - recent , ulog, string , but no effect.
> Since we can reach OOM most of the memory is going to be filled with the
> leak, and we are thinking to try to dump and analyze it.
> We have looked at the "crash" tool, and we will see what we can do with
> it. Meanwhile do you have any hint/ideas ?
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
I understand you dont want to tell us exact firewall rules you have.
Maybe you could post at least following infos :
# cat /proc/slabinfo
# lsmod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-01 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-24 17:28 Slow OOM in netif_RX function Ivan Dichev
2008-01-24 18:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-01-24 19:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-01-24 21:18 ` Ivan H. Dichev
2008-01-24 21:51 ` Francois Romieu
2008-01-25 13:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-25 14:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-02-01 12:51 ` Ivan Dichev
2008-02-01 13:16 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-02-01 15:38 ` Ivan Dichev
2008-02-04 14:54 ` Ivan Dichev
2008-02-04 15:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-05 9:04 ` Ivan Mitev
2008-02-01 14:29 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A31BBA.8040307@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=idichev@obs.bg \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).