netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Still oopsing in nf_nat_move_storage()
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:26:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A44553.2090703@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47A3AE41.6070104@redhat.com>

Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 01/31/2008 01:03 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> On 01/29/2008 12:18 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>>>> nf_nat_move_storage():
>>>> /usr/src/debug/kernel-2.6.23/linux-2.6.23.i686/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:612
>>>>
>>>>       87:       f7 47 64 80 01 00 00    testl  $0x180,0x64(%edi)
>>>>       8e:       74 39                   je     c9
>>>> <nf_nat_move_storage+0x65>
>>>>
>>>> line 612:
>>>>         if (!(ct->status & IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK))
>>>>                 return;
>>>>
>>>> ct is NULL
>>> The current kernel (and 2.6.23-stable) have:
>>>
>>>         if (!ct || !(ct->status & IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK))
>>>                 return;
>>>
>>> so it seems you're using an old version.
> 
> So, it is now oopsing after the test for NULL and only x86_64 is
> catching the invalid address because it is non-canonical. Checking
> for NULL is obviously not enough...


The addresses passed to ->move seems to be bogus, we're doing:

           t->move(ct, ct->ext + ct->ext->offset[i]);

without assigning the new ct->ext first, which is wrong for
two reasons:

- the new ext hasn't been assigned to the conntrack yet,
   so its moving within the same extension

- ct->ext + ct->ext->offset[i] should be (void *)ct->ext + ...

I'll fix it and send a patch after some testing. Still wondering
why this wasn't noticed before.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-02 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-29 17:11 Still oopsing in nf_nat_move_storage() Chuck Ebbert
2008-01-29 17:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-01-31 18:03   ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-02-01 23:41     ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-02-02 10:26       ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-02-02 11:02       ` Patrick McHardy
2008-02-05 16:26         ` Thomas Woerner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47A44553.2090703@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).