From: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TG3 network data corruption regression 2.6.24/2.6.23.4
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:01:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BC40BE.6080106@cybernetics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1203465163.13495.102.camel@dell>
Michael Chan wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 17:14 -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
>
>
>> Update: when I revert Herbert's patch in addition to applying your
>> patch, the iSCSI performance goes back up to 115 MB/s again in both
>> directions. So it looks like turning off SG for TX didn't itself cause
>> the performance drop, but rather that the performance drop is just
>> another manifestation of whatever bug is causing the data corruption.
>>
>> I do not regularly use wireshark or look at network packet dumps, so I
>> am not really sure what to look for. Given the above information, do
>> you still believe that there is value in examining the packet dump?
>>
>>
>
> Can you confirm whether you're getting TCP checksum errors on the other
> side that is receiving packets from the 5701? You can just check
> statistics using netstat -s. I suspect that after we turn off SG,
> checksum is no longer offloaded and we are getting lots of TCP checksum
> errors instead that are slowing the performance.
>
>
>
Confirmed. With a 100 MB read/write test, netstat -s shows 75 bad
segments received, and performance in the one direction is about 5
MB/s. When I switch to the SysKonnect NIC, netstat -s shows 0 bad
segments received, and performance is 115 MB/s. So that solves that
mystery - there is still data corruption, but the software-computed TCP
checksum causes the bad packets to be retransmitted rather than being
passed on to the application.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-20 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-18 22:41 TG3 network data corruption regression 2.6.24/2.6.23.4 Tony Battersby
2008-02-19 0:32 ` Michael Chan
2008-02-19 0:35 ` David Miller
2008-02-19 1:04 ` Michael Chan
2008-02-19 16:16 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-19 19:11 ` Michael Chan
2008-02-19 19:26 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-19 22:14 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-19 23:52 ` Michael Chan
2008-02-20 15:01 ` Tony Battersby [this message]
2008-02-20 1:38 ` Matt Carlson
2008-02-20 16:13 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-20 21:29 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-20 23:04 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-20 23:08 ` David Miller
2008-02-20 23:17 ` Michael Chan
2008-02-20 3:45 ` Herbert Xu
2008-02-20 15:18 ` Tony Battersby
2008-04-15 0:12 ` Matt Carlson
2008-04-15 15:39 ` Tony Battersby
2008-04-16 3:31 ` David Miller
2008-04-16 15:40 ` Michael Chan
2008-04-16 20:17 ` Matt Carlson
2008-04-16 21:00 ` Tony Battersby
2008-04-18 6:20 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BC40BE.6080106@cybernetics.com \
--to=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).