netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ramkrishna.Vepa@neterion.com, Sreenivasa.Honnur@neterion.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, support@neterion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25 2/4]S2io: Multiqueue network device support - FIFO selection based on L4 ports
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:21:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BCB60C.3040409@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080220.151834.133850272.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:15:13 +0100
>
>   
>> I missed those discussions, but this has already been agreed on,
>> fine by me. It would still be preferable to use queue_mapping
>> instead of priority IMO, even if its activated by a module
>> parameter, since that leaves the option to use classifiers.
>>     
>
> I think the driver should compute the value in it's transmit
> routine and keep the value local.  It shouldn't be setting
> skb->foo values at all, they don't belong to the driver
> and this could confuse other code.
>   

Yes, I didn't meant it should set anything, but on of the options
this patch introduces is to _use_ skb->priority for classification,
so the classification is already external, in which case it might
as well offer the full flexibility (as one option) to use qdisc
classifiers.




  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-20 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-20 22:07 [PATCH 2.6.25 2/4]S2io: Multiqueue network device support - FIFO selection based on L4 ports Sreenivasa Honnur
2008-02-20 22:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-02-20 22:57   ` Ramkrishna Vepa
2008-02-20 23:08     ` Patrick McHardy
2008-02-20 23:12       ` David Miller
2008-02-20 23:15         ` Patrick McHardy
2008-02-20 23:18           ` David Miller
2008-02-20 23:21             ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-02-20 23:49               ` Ramkrishna Vepa
2008-02-24  5:01         ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47BCB60C.3040409@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=Ramkrishna.Vepa@neterion.com \
    --cc=Sreenivasa.Honnur@neterion.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=support@neterion.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).