netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be>,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH (resend)][EBTABLES]: Fix alignment checks in ebt_among.ko module.
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:48:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C7FF31.1060108@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47C7C23C.2050100@openvz.org>

Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> I've sent this patch some days ago to Bart, but with no answer...
> 
> When trying to do
> 
> 	# ebtables -A FORWARD --among-src 0:12:34:56:78:9a=192.168.0.10 -j ACCEPT
> 
> on x86_64 box the ebt_among->check() callback warns me that
> 
> 	ebtables: among: wrong size: 1060 against expected 1056, rounded to 1056
> 
> Checking the ebtables sources, I found that the alignment is done
> differently in the tool and the kernel. Tool makes it like this:
> 
> 	EBT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ebt_among_info)) + X
> 
> while the kernel module like this:
> 
> 	EBT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ebt_among_info) + X)
> 
> So the suggested fix is to move the alignment in the kernel. After
> the fix the rule is added and appears in the ebtables -L output.


It seems the kernel is correct and userspace is doing it
wrong, so I think userspace should be fixed instead.
The problem with your patch is that is causes misalignment
for following structures that contain u64 members.



  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-29 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-29  8:28 [PATCH (resend)][EBTABLES]: Fix alignment checks in ebt_among.ko module Pavel Emelyanov
2008-02-29 12:48 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-02-29 15:40   ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-29 17:23     ` Bart De Schuymer
2008-02-29 18:46       ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-02 15:12   ` Bart De Schuymer
2008-03-03  8:50     ` Pavel Emelyanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47C7FF31.1060108@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=bdschuym@pandora.be \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).