netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC [PATCH 3/3] TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT updates: more accurate timers and	resets
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:53:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C935BC.9060409@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1204076973.15970.37.camel@tng>

Patrick McManus a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
> 
>   Change TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT implementation so that it transitions a
>     connection to ESTABLISHED after handshake is complete instead of
>     leaving it in SYN-RECV until some data arrvies. Place connection in
>     accept queue when first data packet arrives from slow path.
> 
>     Benefits:
>      - established connection is now reset if it never makes it to the accept
>      queue
> 
>      - diagnostic state of established matches with the packet traces
>        showing completed handshake
> 
>     - TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT timeouts are expressed in seconds and can now be
>       enforced with reasonable accuracy instead of rounding up to next
>       exponential back-off of syn-ack retry.

This all makes sense Patrick.

Your patch is quite large and difficult to review (for me :) )

1) Adding "struct tcp_deferred_accept_info" on "struct tcp_sock" (24 bytes on 
64 bit arches) is a rather high cost to pay for an obscure TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT.

But then, many "struct tcp_sock" fields are used only at socket establishment.

2) About MAX_TCP_ACCEPT_DEFERRED test in do_tcp_setsockopt(), I am not sure we 
can return -EINVAL.

setsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT, 100000) is a hint given by application, and could 
be mapped to setsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT, 65535) silently.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-01 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-27  1:49 RFC [PATCH 3/3] TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT updates: more accurate timers and resets Patrick McManus
2008-03-01 10:53 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-03-01 20:59   ` Patrick McManus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47C935BC.9060409@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=mcmanus@ducksong.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).