From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC [PATCH 3/3] TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT updates: more accurate timers and resets
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:53:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C935BC.9060409@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1204076973.15970.37.camel@tng>
Patrick McManus a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
>
> Change TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT implementation so that it transitions a
> connection to ESTABLISHED after handshake is complete instead of
> leaving it in SYN-RECV until some data arrvies. Place connection in
> accept queue when first data packet arrives from slow path.
>
> Benefits:
> - established connection is now reset if it never makes it to the accept
> queue
>
> - diagnostic state of established matches with the packet traces
> showing completed handshake
>
> - TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT timeouts are expressed in seconds and can now be
> enforced with reasonable accuracy instead of rounding up to next
> exponential back-off of syn-ack retry.
This all makes sense Patrick.
Your patch is quite large and difficult to review (for me :) )
1) Adding "struct tcp_deferred_accept_info" on "struct tcp_sock" (24 bytes on
64 bit arches) is a rather high cost to pay for an obscure TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT.
But then, many "struct tcp_sock" fields are used only at socket establishment.
2) About MAX_TCP_ACCEPT_DEFERRED test in do_tcp_setsockopt(), I am not sure we
can return -EINVAL.
setsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT, 100000) is a hint given by application, and could
be mapped to setsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT, 65535) silently.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-01 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-27 1:49 RFC [PATCH 3/3] TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT updates: more accurate timers and resets Patrick McManus
2008-03-01 10:53 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-03-01 20:59 ` Patrick McManus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C935BC.9060409@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=mcmanus@ducksong.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).