netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net>
To: Benjamin Thery <ben.thery@gmail.com>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Denis Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: network namespace ipv6 perfs
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:27:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CC3516.7030901@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <939d53060803030704g5d693c19i34061f1a896d91cd@mail.gmail.com>

Benjamin Thery wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote:
>> Benjamin Thery wrote:
>>  > Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>  >> Hi,
>>  >>
>>  >> Some performance tests was made by Benjamin to watch out the impact of
>>  >> the network namespace. The good news is there is no impact when used
>>  >> with or without namespaces. That has been checked using a real network
>>  >> device inside a network namespace.
>>  >>
>>  >> These results are consistent with the ones previously made for ipv4.
>>  >>
>>  >> http://lxc.sourceforge.net/network/bench_ipv6_graph.php
>>  >>
>>  >> Thanks to Benjamin who did all the performance tests :)
>>  >
>>  > In these results, may be, there is one thing that should be explained.
>>  > It is the CPU utilization overhead in the 'veth' case.
>>  >
>>  > Compared to physical devices or macvlan, veth interfaces don't benefit
>>  > from hardware offloading mechanisms: i.e. checksums have to be computed
>>  > by the soft. That explains the big overhead in CPU utilization when
>>
>>  You can tune the veth devices not to account checksum when unnecessary.
> 
> Oh. This is interesting.
> 
> You mean with ethtool -K rx/tx?
> I will give it a try.

Pavel,

I had no luck with "ethtool -K veth0 rx on tx on".
On my testbed, with these options TCP drops packets
(trying to establish a ssh connection between init and child namespace).


Then, I tested "ethtool -K veth0 rx on tx off".
This time TCP (and netperf) work, but I see no difference in
CPU load compared to the case without offloading.

Can I tune veth differently?

(BTW, I run netperf between a child namespace on host A and netserv
on host B. The stream goes through the following interface:
veth1 on A -> veth0 on A -> eth1 on A -> ("real network") -> eth1 on B)

Benjamin

> 
>>
>>  > using this kind of virtual interface.
>>  >
>>  > Benjamin
>>  >
>>  >> Regards
>>  >>     -- Daniel
>>  >>
> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>>  the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>  More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> 


-- 
B e n j a m i n   T h e r y  - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D

    http://www.bull.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-03 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-03 14:20 network namespace ipv6 perfs Daniel Lezcano
2008-03-03 14:42 ` Benjamin Thery
2008-03-03 14:55   ` [Devel] " Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-03 15:04     ` Benjamin Thery
2008-03-03 17:27       ` Benjamin Thery [this message]
2008-03-05 12:39         ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-03 14:48 ` Benjamin Thery
2008-03-03 19:38 ` Rick Jones
2008-03-03 20:01   ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-03-04 15:59     ` Benjamin Thery

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47CC3516.7030901@bull.net \
    --to=benjamin.thery@bull.net \
    --cc=ben.thery@gmail.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).