netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP IPv4 strange retransmits
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:31:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CD5D43.9020408@nets.rwth-aachen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803041507001.5423@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>

Hi,

Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
> 
>> I'm observing some retransmits with kernel 2.6.24.2, which I don't 
>> understand. For instance in this cutout[1] of a sequence diagram which 
>> was captured[2] on the TCP sender, 4 retransmits are made.
> 
> They don't correspond to each other?

Hmm, they should.

> 
>> According to netstat -st output[3][4] all those 4 retransmits were "fast 
>> retransmit".
>> But there are no three DUPACKs which I expected would be needed for fast 
>> retransmit?
> 
> With FACK it's enough that you have fackets_out > tp->reordering 
> (=dupThresh).

If it is FACK shouldn't it be accounted for LINUX_MIB_TCPFORWARDRETRANS
instead of LINUX_MIB_TCPFASTRETRANS?

> 
>> Also interesting all retransmits happen _after_ those segments were
>> already acked and sacked, internal queuing or latency issues?
> 
> I think your viewer is doing something wrong, sender.dump is not giving 
> such information (or you draw that from wrong end?). Or it just draws
> DSACK like that?

Viewer is tcptrace and xplot. So nothing special at all.
You see it also in wireshark, if you draw a sequence diagram.
You also see it in wireshark if you sort by capture timestamp. I always thought
that capture timestamp order is correct and not dump order, but maybe I'm wrong?

Tcpdump:

12:08:20.667538 IP 192.168.0.7.33824 > 192.168.0.5.50139: . ack 23485 win 22720 <nop,nop,timestamp 969759 972885,nop,nop,sack 2 {24905:26325}{27745:29165}>
^^^^^ got acked at .667538

12:08:20.646749 IP 192.168.0.5.50139 > 192.168.0.7.33824: . 22065:23485(1420) ack 1 win 2864 <nop,nop,timestamp 972885 969754>
^^^^^ got retransmitted at .646749

> 
>> It would be great if somebody could shed some light on this,
>> why those segments are retransmitted.
>> Dumps and xplots are available here[5].
> 
> ...I quickly glanced over it and found no strange behavior in
> the sender.dump.

Best regards,
Arnd


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-04 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-04 13:00 TCP IPv4 strange retransmits Arnd Hannemann
2008-03-04 13:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-03-04 14:31   ` Arnd Hannemann [this message]
2008-03-04 21:04     ` H. Willstrand
2008-03-04 22:41       ` Arnd Hannemann
2008-03-04 21:07     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-03-04 21:19       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-03-04 23:03       ` Arnd Hannemann
2008-03-05  7:00         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-03-05 13:04           ` Arnd Hannemann
2008-03-05 19:32             ` Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47CD5D43.9020408@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
    --to=hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).