From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kok, Auke" Subject: Re: [patch (for 2.6.25?) 1/3] e100: do suspend/shutdown like e1000 Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:44:21 -0800 Message-ID: <47CDDED5.2040207@intel.com> References: <200803042258.m24MwfoZ001397@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <47CDD54A.60101@intel.com> <20080304153330.fd224258.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, arvidjaar@mail.ru To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:22309 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753204AbYCDXsO (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:48:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080304153330.fd224258.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:03:38 -0800 > "Kok, Auke" wrote: > >> akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: >>> From: "Kok, Auke" >>> >>> This fixes a "trying to free already free IRQ" message and simplifies the >>> shutdown/suspend code by re-using already existing code when going to >>> suspend. The code is now symmetric with e100_resume. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok >>> Tested-by: Andrey Borzenkov >>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton >> >> This should already be in jeff's inbox ... >> > > It's been two weeks nearly - Jeff's inbox might have sprunk a leak ;) > > There are lots of leaky inboxes - I have just finished spraying nearly 200 > dribbles at various maintainers. lol, I actually did not send this to jeff until yesterday myself, so you can blame my inbox for being slow, not Jeff in this case ;) Auke