From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH][NEIGH]: Fix race between pneigh deletion and ipv6's ndisc_recv_ns - V2 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:32:17 +0100 Message-ID: <47D7B131.9060607@fr.ibm.com> References: <47CFD2ED.3060207@openvz.org> <47D68817.9030709@openvz.org> <20080311.175212.74407707.davem@davemloft.net> <47D7A52D.2090007@fr.ibm.com> <47D7B0C3.1010801@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Emelyanov Return-path: Received: from mtagate6.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.155]:43564 "EHLO mtagate6.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751483AbYCLKd4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:33:56 -0400 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate6.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2CAXthp444744 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:33:55 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2CAXssM1605746 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:33:54 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2CAXslV024916 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:33:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <47D7B0C3.1010801@openvz.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> David Miller wrote: >>> From: Pavel Emelyanov >>> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:24:39 +0300 >>> >>>> You picked up the patch with /proc/net symlink, but skipped this >>>> one, while it was sent earlier. Is it _that_ bad :) ? >>> I am travelling and giving presentations in Japan, and >>> this patch is in my backlog to look at :-) >> The patch does not apply anymore due to the ndisc modification to be per >> namespace. I modified it to take the namespace into account and >> initialized the is_router variable to avoid a compilation warning. >> > > My patch applies to net-2.6, while yours does not. > Which tree is it for? well, hum, net-2.6.26 :|