From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [PATCH][NEIGH]: Fix race between pneigh deletion and ipv6's ndisc_recv_ns - V2 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:40:31 +0300 Message-ID: <47D7B31F.40800@openvz.org> References: <47CFD2ED.3060207@openvz.org> <47D68817.9030709@openvz.org> <20080311.175212.74407707.davem@davemloft.net> <47D7A52D.2090007@fr.ibm.com> <47D7B0C3.1010801@openvz.org> <47D7B131.9060607@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?WU9TSElGVUpJIEhpZGVha2kgLyDlkInol6Toi7HmmI4=?= To: Daniel Lezcano Return-path: Received: from sacred.ru ([62.205.161.221]:50461 "EHLO sacred.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752773AbYCLKks (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:40:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47D7B131.9060607@fr.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> David Miller wrote: >>>> From: Pavel Emelyanov >>>> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:24:39 +0300 >>>> >>>>> You picked up the patch with /proc/net symlink, but skipped this >>>>> one, while it was sent earlier. Is it _that_ bad :) ? >>>> I am travelling and giving presentations in Japan, and >>>> this patch is in my backlog to look at :-) >>> The patch does not apply anymore due to the ndisc modification to be per >>> namespace. I modified it to take the namespace into account and >>> initialized the is_router variable to avoid a compilation warning. >>> >> My patch applies to net-2.6, while yours does not. >> Which tree is it for? > > well, hum, net-2.6.26 :| OK. Then I will fix the comments from YOSHIFUJI and re-send the patch for net-2.6. Thanks, Pavel