From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.26][VLAN]: Reduce memory consumed by vlan_group-s.
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:36:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47DF8D08.9010205@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CC2ACF.6080903@openvz.org>
Hi, Patrick!
Did you have time to look at this patch? And besides, Alexey
Dobriyan sent some netns-related patches for netfilter... :)
Thanks,
Pavel
> Currently each vlan_groupd contains 8 pointers on arrays with 512
> pointers on struct net_device each :) Such a construction "in many
> cases ... wastes memory".
>
> My proposal is to allow for some of these arrays pointers be NULL,
> meaning that there are no devices in it. When a new device is added
> to the vlan_group, the appropriate array is allocated.
>
> The check in vlan_group_get_device's is safe, since the pointer
> vg->vlan_devices_arrays[x] can only switch from NULL to not-NULL.
> The vlan_group_prealloc_vid() is guarded with rtnl lock and is
> also safe.
>
> I've checked (I hope that) all the places, that use these arrays
> and found, that the register_vlan_dev is the only place, that can
> put a vlan device on an empty vlan_group.
>
> Rough calculations shows, that after the patch a setup with a
> single vlan dev (or up to 512 vlans with sequential vids) will
> occupy approximately 8 times less memory.
>
> The question I have is - does this patch makes sense, or a totally
> new structures are required to store the vlan_devs?
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_vlan.h b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
> index 79504b2..edd55af 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_vlan.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static inline struct net_device *vlan_group_get_device(struct vlan_group *vg,
> {
> struct net_device **array;
> array = vg->vlan_devices_arrays[vlan_id / VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_PART_LEN];
> - return array[vlan_id % VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_PART_LEN];
> + return array ? array[vlan_id % VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_PART_LEN] : NULL;
> }
>
> static inline void vlan_group_set_device(struct vlan_group *vg,
> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan.c b/net/8021q/vlan.c
> index dbc81b9..4ff856d 100644
> --- a/net/8021q/vlan.c
> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan.c
> @@ -106,29 +106,35 @@ static void vlan_group_free(struct vlan_group *grp)
> static struct vlan_group *vlan_group_alloc(int ifindex)
> {
> struct vlan_group *grp;
> - unsigned int size;
> - unsigned int i;
>
> grp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vlan_group), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!grp)
> return NULL;
>
> - size = sizeof(struct net_device *) * VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_PART_LEN;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_SPLIT_PARTS; i++) {
> - grp->vlan_devices_arrays[i] = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!grp->vlan_devices_arrays[i])
> - goto err;
> - }
> -
> grp->real_dev_ifindex = ifindex;
> hlist_add_head_rcu(&grp->hlist,
> &vlan_group_hash[vlan_grp_hashfn(ifindex)]);
> return grp;
> +}
>
> -err:
> - vlan_group_free(grp);
> - return NULL;
> +static int vlan_group_prealloc_vid(struct vlan_group *vg, int vid)
> +{
> + struct net_device **array;
> + unsigned int size;
> +
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + array = vg->vlan_devices_arrays[vid / VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_PART_LEN];
> + if (array != NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + size = sizeof(struct net_device *) * VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_PART_LEN;
> + array = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (array == NULL)
> + return -ENOBUFS;
> +
> + vg->vlan_devices_arrays[vid / VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_PART_LEN] = array;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void vlan_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> @@ -247,6 +253,10 @@ int register_vlan_dev(struct net_device *dev)
> return -ENOBUFS;
> }
>
> + err = vlan_group_prealloc_vid(grp, vlan_id);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto out_free_group;
> +
> err = register_netdevice(dev);
> if (err < 0)
> goto out_free_group;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-18 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-03 16:43 [PATCH net-2.6.26][VLAN]: Reduce memory consumed by vlan_group-s Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-18 9:36 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2008-03-20 14:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-03-26 15:12 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-26 15:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-03-26 15:51 ` Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47DF8D08.9010205@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).