Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1

Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:33:02 +0100
"Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >  > Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org):
> >  > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-mm1/
> >  I suspect that fewer people are testing linux-next and -mm nowadays.  We
> >  should encourage them to do so, although given the general
> >  trainwreckishness of current mainline, this isn't really where our effort
> >  should be expended.
> 
> 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 worked nicely for me, but 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 does not boot.
> 
> dmesg:
> [    0.000000] Linux version 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 (root@treogen) (gcc
> version 4.2.3 (Gentoo 4.2.3 p1.0)) #1 SMP Wed Mar 12 19:51:41 CET 2008
> [    0.000000] Command line: earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200
> console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty1 crypt_root=/dev/md1 sata_nv.swncq=1

So you aren't using netconsole.  I had a series of hangs yesterday which
went away when netconsole was disabled.  I think netconsole is still
busted.

> ...
>
> be reserved
> [    1.943656] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xffffffff could
> not be reserved
> [    1.961251] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:06.0
> [    1.964921]   IO window: disabled.
> [    1.968331]   MEM window: 0xeff00000-0xefffffff
> [    1.980903]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000eef00000-0x00000000eeffffff
> [    1.987254] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0b.0
> [    2.000871]   IO window: e000-efff
> [    2.004283]   MEM window: 0xefe00000-0xefefffff
> [    2.022569]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> [    2.026646] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0c.0
> [    2.030312]   IO window: disabled.
> [    2.040486]   MEM window: 0xefd00000-0xefdfffff
> [    2.045020]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> [    2.050486] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0d.0
> [    2.062526]   IO window: disabled.
> [    2.065935]   MEM window: 0xefc00000-0xefcfffff
> [    2.082499]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> [    2.086432] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0f.0
> [    2.092499]   IO window: d000-dfff
> [    2.102467]   MEM window: 0xefb00000-0xefbfffff
> [    2.107000]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000e0000000-0x00000000e7ffffff
> [    2.122526] NET: Registered protocol family 2
> -> System hang, no reaction to the SysRq keys.
> 
> >From 2.6.25-rc3-mm1:
> [    1.505990] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:06.0
> [    1.509654]   IO window: disabled.
> [    1.513064]   MEM window: 0xeff00000-0xefffffff
> [    1.515228]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000eef00000-0x00000000eeffffff
> [    1.521579] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0b.0
> [    1.525226]   IO window: e000-efff
> [    1.528638]   MEM window: 0xefe00000-0xefefffff
> [    1.535226]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> [    1.539295] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0c.0
> [    1.542960]   IO window: disabled.
> [    1.545226]   MEM window: 0xefd00000-0xefdfffff
> [    1.549763]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> [    1.555227] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0d.0
> [    1.558897]   IO window: disabled.
> [    1.562304]   MEM window: 0xefc00000-0xefcfffff
> [    1.565226]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> [    1.569159] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0f.0
> [    1.575226]   IO window: d000-dfff
> [    1.578632]   MEM window: 0xefb00000-0xefbfffff
> [    1.583162]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000e0000000-0x00000000e7ffffff
> [    1.585317] NET: Registered protocol family 2
> [    1.695224] IP route cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8,
> 1048576 bytes)
> [    1.695224] TCP established hash table entries: 524288 (order: 11,
> 8388608 bytes)
> [    1.705988] TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
> [    1.713229] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 524288 bind 65536)

OK, so it looks like it died during networking initialisation.

Could you please add initcall_debug to the boot command line so we can see
which function it is getting stuck in?

Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1

[Torsten Kaiser]

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:33:02 +0100
>  "Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:
>  > dmesg:
>  > [    0.000000] Linux version 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 (root@treogen) (gcc
>  > version 4.2.3 (Gentoo 4.2.3 p1.0)) #1 SMP Wed Mar 12 19:51:41 CET 2008
>  > [    0.000000] Command line: earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200
>  > console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty1 crypt_root=/dev/md1 sata_nv.swncq=1
>
>  So you aren't using netconsole.  I had a series of hangs yesterday which
>  went away when netconsole was disabled.  I think netconsole is still
>  busted.

No, just a plain serial console.

>  > be reserved
>  > [    1.943656] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xffffffff could
>  > not be reserved
>  > [    1.961251] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:06.0
>  > [    1.964921]   IO window: disabled.
>  > [    1.968331]   MEM window: 0xeff00000-0xefffffff
>  > [    1.980903]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000eef00000-0x00000000eeffffff
>  > [    1.987254] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0b.0
>  > [    2.000871]   IO window: e000-efff
>  > [    2.004283]   MEM window: 0xefe00000-0xefefffff
>  > [    2.022569]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
>  > [    2.026646] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0c.0
>  > [    2.030312]   IO window: disabled.
>  > [    2.040486]   MEM window: 0xefd00000-0xefdfffff
>  > [    2.045020]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
>  > [    2.050486] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0d.0
>  > [    2.062526]   IO window: disabled.
>  > [    2.065935]   MEM window: 0xefc00000-0xefcfffff
>  > [    2.082499]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
>  > [    2.086432] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0f.0
>  > [    2.092499]   IO window: d000-dfff
>  > [    2.102467]   MEM window: 0xefb00000-0xefbfffff
>  > [    2.107000]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000e0000000-0x00000000e7ffffff
>  > [    2.122526] NET: Registered protocol family 2
>  > -> System hang, no reaction to the SysRq keys.
[snip]
>  OK, so it looks like it died during networking initialisation.
>
>  Could you please add initcall_debug to the boot command line so we can see
>  which function it is getting stuck in?

Yes, here is the result:
[    2.573979] PCI-DMA: Disabling AGP.
[    2.577639] PCI-DMA: aperture base @ 8000000 size 65536 KB
[    2.589504] PCI-DMA: using GART IOMMU.
[    2.593258] PCI-DMA: Reserving 64MB of IOMMU area in the AGP aperture
[    2.600132] initcall pci_iommu_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 19 msecs
[    2.622146] calling  hpet_late_init+0x0/0x140()
[    2.626689] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 31
[    2.633022] hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz
[    2.638562] initcall hpet_late_init+0x0/0x140() returned 0 after 9 msecs
[    2.654545] calling  clocksource_done_booting+0x0/0x20()
[    2.659855] initcall clocksource_done_booting+0x0/0x20()<6>Time:
hpet clocksource has been installed.
[    2.662185]  returned 0 after 0 msecs
[    2.688448] calling  init_pipe_fs+0x0/0x60()
[    2.695423] initcall init_pipe_fs+0x0/0x60() returned 0 after 0 msecs
[    2.705784] calling  init_mnt_writers+0x0/0x70()
[    2.711681] initcall init_mnt_writers+0x0/0x70() returned 0 after 0 msecs
[    2.721678] calling  eventpoll_init+0x0/0x90()
[    2.731644] initcall eventpoll_init+0x0/0x90() returned 0 after 0 msecs
[    2.738295] calling  anon_inode_init+0x0/0x130()
[    2.751614] initcall anon_inode_init+0x0/0x130() returned 0 after 0 msecs
[    2.771585] calling  pcie_aspm_init+0x0/0x30()
[    2.779297] initcall pcie_aspm_init+0x0/0x30() returned 0 after 2 msecs
[    2.793911] calling  acpi_event_init+0x0/0x52()

-> it looked like the system this time already hung here. But just
pressing the 'Alt' key let the system continue until the network hang.
(I tried this a second time, again it paused here until I pressed a key)

[   94.857929] initcall acpi_event_init+0x0/0x52() returned 0 after 29276 msecs
[   94.865002] calling  pnp_system_init+0x0/0x20()
[   94.877935] system 00:06: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved
[   94.884286] system 00:06: ioport range 0x7b0-0x7df has been reserved
[   94.897886] system 00:06: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved
[   94.907886] system 00:06: ioport range 0xbb0-0xbdf has been reserved
[   94.917855] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2000-0x207f has been reserved
[   94.937827] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2080-0x20ff has been reserved
[   94.947827] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2400-0x247f has been reserved
[   94.957793] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2480-0x24ff has been reserved
[   94.977766] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2800-0x287f has been reserved
[   94.987766] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2880-0x28ff has been reserved
[   94.997734] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2c00-0x2c7f has been reserved
[   95.017708] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2c80-0x2cff has been reserved
[   95.024234] system 00:06: iomem range 0x0-0x0 could not be reserved
[   95.037678] system 00:06: iomem range 0xfee01000-0xfeefffff could
not be reserved
[   95.060158] system 00:06: iomem range 0xefa80000-0xefabffff has been reserved
[   95.070158] system 00:06: iomem range 0xffb00000-0xffbfffff could
not be reserved
[   95.077633] system 00:06: iomem range 0xfff00000-0xffffffff could
not be reserved
[   95.097590] system 00:08: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec00fff could
not be reserved
[   95.120064] system 00:08: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee00fff could
not be reserved
[   95.130070] system 00:0c: ioport range 0x290-0x297 has been reserved
[   95.137523] system 00:0d: iomem range 0x0-0x9ffff could not be reserved
[   95.157495] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xc0000-0xcffff has been reserved
[   95.167495] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xe0000-0xfffff could not be reserved
[   95.177463] system 00:0d: iomem range 0x100000-0xdfffffff could not
be reserved
[   95.197437] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xffffffff could
not be reserved
[   95.219983] initcall pnp_system_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 162 msecs
[   95.226887] calling  chr_dev_init+0x0/0xd0()
[   95.237813] initcall chr_dev_init+0x0/0xd0() returned 0 after 0 msecs
[   95.247378] calling  firmware_class_init+0x0/0x90()
[   95.257320] initcall firmware_class_init+0x0/0x90() returned 0 after 0 msecs
[   95.276031] calling  loopback_init+0x0/0x20()
[   95.288590] initcall loopback_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 0 msecs
[   95.296837] calling  cpufreq_gov_performance_init+0x0/0x20()
[   95.309084] initcall cpufreq_gov_performance_init+0x0/0x20()
returned 0 after 0 msecs
[   95.317734] calling  cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x0/0x50()
[   95.338090] initcall cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x0/0x50() returned 0 after 0 msecs
[   95.345254] calling  init_acpi_pm_clocksource+0x0/0xc0()
[   95.355293] initcall init_acpi_pm_clocksource+0x0/0xc0() returned 0
after 0 msecs
[   95.374115] calling  pcibios_assign_resources+0x0/0x90()
[   95.379618] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:06.0
[   95.394087]   IO window: disabled.
[   95.397502]   MEM window: 0xeff00000-0xefffffff
[   95.402032]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000eef00000-0x00000000eeffffff
[   95.415189] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0b.0
[   95.418860]   IO window: e000-efff
[   95.438075]   MEM window: 0xefe00000-0xefefffff
[   95.442610]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
[   95.455526] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0c.0
[   95.459197]   IO window: disabled.
[   95.462604]   MEM window: 0xefd00000-0xefdfffff
[   95.475513]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
[   95.479443] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0d.0
[   95.485512]   IO window: disabled.
[   95.495480]   MEM window: 0xefc00000-0xefcfffff
[   95.500010]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
[   95.515455] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0f.0
[   95.519124]   IO window: d000-dfff
[   95.522533]   MEM window: 0xefb00000-0xefbfffff
[   95.535423]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000e0000000-0x00000000e7ffffff
[   95.545456] initcall pcibios_assign_resources+0x0/0x90() returned 0
after 79 msecs
[   95.557830] calling  fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask+0x0/0x100()
[   95.575408] initcall fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask+0x0/0x100() returned 0
after 0 msecs
[   95.593777] calling  inet_init+0x0/0x380()
[   95.597890] NET: Registered protocol family 2

-> same hang, no reaction to SysRq.

What looks suspicious: The call to pcie_aspm_init is just before the
temporary hang. When I used make oldconfig to upgrade the .config from
2.6.25-rc3-mm1 to -rc5-mm1 I activated the new option CONFIG_PCIEASPM.

I will try with CONFIG_PCIEASPM_DEBUG added and completely without this option.

Torsten

[2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Tilman Schmidt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3391 bytes --]

Am 11.03.2008 09:14 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-mm1/

I'm noticing a strange effect with this:

On my openSUSE 10.3 development machine with SUSEs default MTA
Postfix installed, I occasionally send a pre-formatted mail by
feeding it directly into "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t". If I try that
while running a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 kernel, I get:

ts@xenon:~/kernel> /usr/sbin/sendmail -t < patch-usb-reduce-syslog-clutter-v3
postdrop: warning: can't open /proc/net/if_inet6 (Permission denied) - skipping IPv6 configuration
postdrop: fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for ::1
sendmail: warning: command "/usr/sbin/postdrop -r" exited with status 1
sendmail: fatal: ts(1000): unable to execute /usr/sbin/postdrop -r: Success
ts@xenon:~/kernel>

and unsurprisingly, the mail is not sent. If I do the same as root,
everything works as usual, there is no console output from the
sendmail command, and the mail goes out as it should. All other
networking applications appear to be running normally.

On a 2.6.25-rc5 (non-mm) kernel I do not need to run the sendmail
command as root. It works just as well if I run it as myself.

IPv6 is not in use on that machine. The Ethernet interface has
just the link local IPv6 address. Possibly relevant information:

ts@xenon:~> /sbin/ifconfig -a
eth0      Protokoll:Ethernet  Hardware Adresse 00:19:D1:03:D8:FF
          inet Adresse:192.168.59.102  Bcast:192.168.59.255  Maske:255.255.255.0
          inet6 Adresse: fe80::219:d1ff:fe03:d8ff/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung
          UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:78 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:145 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:100
          RX bytes:9547 (9.3 Kb)  TX bytes:17952 (17.5 Kb)
          Speicher:92c00000-92c20000

lo        Protokoll:Lokale Schleife
          inet Adresse:127.0.0.1  Maske:255.0.0.0
          inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0
          RX bytes:100 (100.0 b)  TX bytes:100 (100.0 b)

ts@xenon:~/kernel> ls -l /proc/net/if_inet6
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 13. Mär 19:26 /proc/net/if_inet6
ts@xenon:~> cat /proc/net/if_inet6
fe800000000000000219d1fffe03d8ff 02 40 20 80     eth0
00000000000000000000000000000001 01 80 10 80       lo
ts@xenon:~> uname -a
Linux xenon 2.6.25-rc5-mm1-testing #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 11 14:34:49 CET 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

As you see, I can cat /proc/net/if_inet6 as regular (non-root) user
just fine, even though Postfix complains it cannot access it.
The content of /proc/net/if_inet6 is identical if I cat it on
kernel 2.6.25-rc5 mainline.

CCing a selection of IPv6 networking related maintainer addresses.
If you need more information or want me to test something, let me
know.

HTH
T.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 253 bytes --]

Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1

[Torsten Kaiser]

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Torsten Kaiser
<just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >  OK, so it looks like it died during networking initialisation.
>  >
>  >  Could you please add initcall_debug to the boot command line so we can see
>  >  which function it is getting stuck in?
>
>  Yes, here is the result:
>  [    2.573979] PCI-DMA: Disabling AGP.
>  [    2.577639] PCI-DMA: aperture base @ 8000000 size 65536 KB
>  [    2.589504] PCI-DMA: using GART IOMMU.
>  [    2.593258] PCI-DMA: Reserving 64MB of IOMMU area in the AGP aperture
>  [    2.600132] initcall pci_iommu_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 19 msecs
>  [    2.622146] calling  hpet_late_init+0x0/0x140()
>  [    2.626689] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 31
>  [    2.633022] hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz
>  [    2.638562] initcall hpet_late_init+0x0/0x140() returned 0 after 9 msecs
>  [    2.654545] calling  clocksource_done_booting+0x0/0x20()
>  [    2.659855] initcall clocksource_done_booting+0x0/0x20()<6>Time:
>
> hpet clocksource has been installed.
>  [    2.662185]  returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [    2.688448] calling  init_pipe_fs+0x0/0x60()
>  [    2.695423] initcall init_pipe_fs+0x0/0x60() returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [    2.705784] calling  init_mnt_writers+0x0/0x70()
>  [    2.711681] initcall init_mnt_writers+0x0/0x70() returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [    2.721678] calling  eventpoll_init+0x0/0x90()
>  [    2.731644] initcall eventpoll_init+0x0/0x90() returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [    2.738295] calling  anon_inode_init+0x0/0x130()
>  [    2.751614] initcall anon_inode_init+0x0/0x130() returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [    2.771585] calling  pcie_aspm_init+0x0/0x30()
>  [    2.779297] initcall pcie_aspm_init+0x0/0x30() returned 0 after 2 msecs
>  [    2.793911] calling  acpi_event_init+0x0/0x52()
>
>  -> it looked like the system this time already hung here. But just
>  pressing the 'Alt' key let the system continue until the network hang.
>  (I tried this a second time, again it paused here until I pressed a key)
>
>  [   94.857929] initcall acpi_event_init+0x0/0x52() returned 0 after 29276 msecs
>  [   94.865002] calling  pnp_system_init+0x0/0x20()
>  [   94.877935] system 00:06: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved
>  [   94.884286] system 00:06: ioport range 0x7b0-0x7df has been reserved
>  [   94.897886] system 00:06: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved
>  [   94.907886] system 00:06: ioport range 0xbb0-0xbdf has been reserved
>  [   94.917855] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2000-0x207f has been reserved
>  [   94.937827] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2080-0x20ff has been reserved
>  [   94.947827] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2400-0x247f has been reserved
>  [   94.957793] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2480-0x24ff has been reserved
>  [   94.977766] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2800-0x287f has been reserved
>  [   94.987766] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2880-0x28ff has been reserved
>  [   94.997734] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2c00-0x2c7f has been reserved
>  [   95.017708] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2c80-0x2cff has been reserved
>  [   95.024234] system 00:06: iomem range 0x0-0x0 could not be reserved
>  [   95.037678] system 00:06: iomem range 0xfee01000-0xfeefffff could
>  not be reserved
>  [   95.060158] system 00:06: iomem range 0xefa80000-0xefabffff has been reserved
>  [   95.070158] system 00:06: iomem range 0xffb00000-0xffbfffff could
>  not be reserved
>  [   95.077633] system 00:06: iomem range 0xfff00000-0xffffffff could
>  not be reserved
>  [   95.097590] system 00:08: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec00fff could
>  not be reserved
>  [   95.120064] system 00:08: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee00fff could
>  not be reserved
>  [   95.130070] system 00:0c: ioport range 0x290-0x297 has been reserved
>  [   95.137523] system 00:0d: iomem range 0x0-0x9ffff could not be reserved
>  [   95.157495] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xc0000-0xcffff has been reserved
>  [   95.167495] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xe0000-0xfffff could not be reserved
>  [   95.177463] system 00:0d: iomem range 0x100000-0xdfffffff could not
>  be reserved
>  [   95.197437] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xffffffff could
>  not be reserved
>  [   95.219983] initcall pnp_system_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 162 msecs
>  [   95.226887] calling  chr_dev_init+0x0/0xd0()
>  [   95.237813] initcall chr_dev_init+0x0/0xd0() returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [   95.247378] calling  firmware_class_init+0x0/0x90()
>  [   95.257320] initcall firmware_class_init+0x0/0x90() returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [   95.276031] calling  loopback_init+0x0/0x20()
>  [   95.288590] initcall loopback_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [   95.296837] calling  cpufreq_gov_performance_init+0x0/0x20()
>  [   95.309084] initcall cpufreq_gov_performance_init+0x0/0x20()
>  returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [   95.317734] calling  cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x0/0x50()
>  [   95.338090] initcall cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x0/0x50() returned 0 after 0 msecs
>  [   95.345254] calling  init_acpi_pm_clocksource+0x0/0xc0()
>  [   95.355293] initcall init_acpi_pm_clocksource+0x0/0xc0() returned 0
>  after 0 msecs
>  [   95.374115] calling  pcibios_assign_resources+0x0/0x90()
>  [   95.379618] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:06.0
>  [   95.394087]   IO window: disabled.
>  [   95.397502]   MEM window: 0xeff00000-0xefffffff
>  [   95.402032]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000eef00000-0x00000000eeffffff
>  [   95.415189] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0b.0
>  [   95.418860]   IO window: e000-efff
>  [   95.438075]   MEM window: 0xefe00000-0xefefffff
>  [   95.442610]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
>  [   95.455526] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0c.0
>  [   95.459197]   IO window: disabled.
>  [   95.462604]   MEM window: 0xefd00000-0xefdfffff
>  [   95.475513]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
>  [   95.479443] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0d.0
>  [   95.485512]   IO window: disabled.
>  [   95.495480]   MEM window: 0xefc00000-0xefcfffff
>  [   95.500010]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
>  [   95.515455] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0f.0
>  [   95.519124]   IO window: d000-dfff
>  [   95.522533]   MEM window: 0xefb00000-0xefbfffff
>  [   95.535423]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000e0000000-0x00000000e7ffffff
>  [   95.545456] initcall pcibios_assign_resources+0x0/0x90() returned 0
>  after 79 msecs
>  [   95.557830] calling  fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask+0x0/0x100()
>  [   95.575408] initcall fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask+0x0/0x100() returned 0
>  after 0 msecs
>  [   95.593777] calling  inet_init+0x0/0x380()
>  [   95.597890] NET: Registered protocol family 2
>
>  -> same hang, no reaction to SysRq.
>
>  What looks suspicious: The call to pcie_aspm_init is just before the
>  temporary hang. When I used make oldconfig to upgrade the .config from
>  2.6.25-rc3-mm1 to -rc5-mm1 I activated the new option CONFIG_PCIEASPM.
>
>  I will try with CONFIG_PCIEASPM_DEBUG added and completely without this option.

CONFIG_PCIEASPM does not change anything.
Also testing the range of ipc patches you suggested to Badari did not fix it.

I did a bisect, these patches are currently remaining, but I dod not
have the time for more bisect steps until tomorrow:

git-scsi-misc
git-sh
execute-tasklets-in-the-same-order-they-were-queued
git-sched
sched: work around hrtick related lockup
sched: make sure jiffies is up to date before calling __update_rq_clock()
sched: fix rq->clock overflows detection with CONFIG_NO_HZ
sched: make cpu_clock() globally synchronous
sched: remove isolcpus
ftrace: make the task state char-string visible to all
sched: add latency tracer callbacks to the scheduler
latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit
sched: cleanup old and rarely used 'debug' features.
[SCSI] zfcp: convert zfcp to use target reset and device reset handler
[SCSI] qla4xxx: Add target reset functionality
[SCSI] scsi_error: add target reset handler
[SCSI] ps3rom: Simplify fill_from_dev_buffer()
[SCSI] scsi_debug: use shost_priv macro
[SCSI] scsi_debug: remove unnecessary checking
[SCSI] scsi_debug: remove scsi_debug.h
[SCSI] scsi_debug: stop including drivers/scsi/scsi.h
[SCSI] Remove random noop unchecked_isa_dma users
[SCSI] aacraid: READ_CAPACITY_16 shouldn't trust allocation length in cdb
[SCSI] st: show options currently set in sysfs
[SCSI] st: add option to use SILI in variable block reads
[SCSI] gdth: remove command accessors
[SCSI] aic94xx: Use sas_request_addr() to provide SAS WWN if the
adapter lacks one
[SCSI] libsas: Provide a transport-level facility to request SAS addrs
[SCSI] ips: sg chaining support to the path to non I/O commands
[SCSI] gdth: convert to PCI hotplug API
[SCSI] gdth: PCI probe cleanups, prep for PCI hotplug API conversion
rtc: rtc-sh: Add support for periodic IRQs.
sh: SuperH KEYSC keypad data for Solution Engine 7722
sh: SuperH KEYSC keypad data for MigoR
sh: SuperH KEYSC platform driver

Torsten

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Daniel Lezcano]

Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 11.03.2008 09:14 schrieb Andrew Morton:
>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-mm1/
> 
> I'm noticing a strange effect with this:
> 
> On my openSUSE 10.3 development machine with SUSEs default MTA
> Postfix installed, I occasionally send a pre-formatted mail by
> feeding it directly into "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t". If I try that
> while running a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 kernel, I get:
> 
> ts@xenon:~/kernel> /usr/sbin/sendmail -t < patch-usb-reduce-syslog-clutter-v3
> postdrop: warning: can't open /proc/net/if_inet6 (Permission denied) - skipping IPv6 configuration
> postdrop: fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for ::1
> sendmail: warning: command "/usr/sbin/postdrop -r" exited with status 1
> sendmail: fatal: ts(1000): unable to execute /usr/sbin/postdrop -r: Success
> ts@xenon:~/kernel>
> 
> and unsurprisingly, the mail is not sent. If I do the same as root,
> everything works as usual, there is no console output from the
> sendmail command, and the mail goes out as it should. All other
> networking applications appear to be running normally.
> 
> On a 2.6.25-rc5 (non-mm) kernel I do not need to run the sendmail
> command as root. It works just as well if I run it as myself.
> 
> IPv6 is not in use on that machine. The Ethernet interface has
> just the link local IPv6 address. Possibly relevant information:
> 
> ts@xenon:~> /sbin/ifconfig -a
> eth0      Protokoll:Ethernet  Hardware Adresse 00:19:D1:03:D8:FF
>           inet Adresse:192.168.59.102  Bcast:192.168.59.255  Maske:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 Adresse: fe80::219:d1ff:fe03:d8ff/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung
>           UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:78 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:145 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:100
>           RX bytes:9547 (9.3 Kb)  TX bytes:17952 (17.5 Kb)
>           Speicher:92c00000-92c20000
> 
> lo        Protokoll:Lokale Schleife
>           inet Adresse:127.0.0.1  Maske:255.0.0.0
>           inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>           RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0
>           RX bytes:100 (100.0 b)  TX bytes:100 (100.0 b)
> 
> ts@xenon:~/kernel> ls -l /proc/net/if_inet6
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 13. Mär 19:26 /proc/net/if_inet6
> ts@xenon:~> cat /proc/net/if_inet6
> fe800000000000000219d1fffe03d8ff 02 40 20 80     eth0
> 00000000000000000000000000000001 01 80 10 80       lo
> ts@xenon:~> uname -a
> Linux xenon 2.6.25-rc5-mm1-testing #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 11 14:34:49 CET 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> 
> As you see, I can cat /proc/net/if_inet6 as regular (non-root) user
> just fine, even though Postfix complains it cannot access it.
> The content of /proc/net/if_inet6 is identical if I cat it on
> kernel 2.6.25-rc5 mainline.
> 
> CCing a selection of IPv6 networking related maintainer addresses.
> If you need more information or want me to test something, let me
> know.

Hi Tilman,

Is it possible to have your config file used to compile the kernel ?

Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:05:11 +0100
"Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Torsten Kaiser
> <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Andrew Morton
> > <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >  OK, so it looks like it died during networking initialisation.
> >  >
> >  >  Could you please add initcall_debug to the boot command line so we can see
> >  >  which function it is getting stuck in?
> >
> >  Yes, here is the result:
> >  [    2.573979] PCI-DMA: Disabling AGP.
> >  [    2.577639] PCI-DMA: aperture base @ 8000000 size 65536 KB
> >  [    2.589504] PCI-DMA: using GART IOMMU.
> >  [    2.593258] PCI-DMA: Reserving 64MB of IOMMU area in the AGP aperture
> >  [    2.600132] initcall pci_iommu_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 19 msecs
> >  [    2.622146] calling  hpet_late_init+0x0/0x140()
> >  [    2.626689] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 31
> >  [    2.633022] hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz
> >  [    2.638562] initcall hpet_late_init+0x0/0x140() returned 0 after 9 msecs
> >  [    2.654545] calling  clocksource_done_booting+0x0/0x20()
> >  [    2.659855] initcall clocksource_done_booting+0x0/0x20()<6>Time:
> >
> > hpet clocksource has been installed.
> >  [    2.662185]  returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [    2.688448] calling  init_pipe_fs+0x0/0x60()
> >  [    2.695423] initcall init_pipe_fs+0x0/0x60() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [    2.705784] calling  init_mnt_writers+0x0/0x70()
> >  [    2.711681] initcall init_mnt_writers+0x0/0x70() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [    2.721678] calling  eventpoll_init+0x0/0x90()
> >  [    2.731644] initcall eventpoll_init+0x0/0x90() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [    2.738295] calling  anon_inode_init+0x0/0x130()
> >  [    2.751614] initcall anon_inode_init+0x0/0x130() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [    2.771585] calling  pcie_aspm_init+0x0/0x30()
> >  [    2.779297] initcall pcie_aspm_init+0x0/0x30() returned 0 after 2 msecs
> >  [    2.793911] calling  acpi_event_init+0x0/0x52()
> >
> >  -> it looked like the system this time already hung here. But just
> >  pressing the 'Alt' key let the system continue until the network hang.
> >  (I tried this a second time, again it paused here until I pressed a key)
> >
> >  [   94.857929] initcall acpi_event_init+0x0/0x52() returned 0 after 29276 msecs
> >  [   94.865002] calling  pnp_system_init+0x0/0x20()
> >  [   94.877935] system 00:06: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved
> >  [   94.884286] system 00:06: ioport range 0x7b0-0x7df has been reserved
> >  [   94.897886] system 00:06: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved
> >  [   94.907886] system 00:06: ioport range 0xbb0-0xbdf has been reserved
> >  [   94.917855] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2000-0x207f has been reserved
> >  [   94.937827] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2080-0x20ff has been reserved
> >  [   94.947827] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2400-0x247f has been reserved
> >  [   94.957793] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2480-0x24ff has been reserved
> >  [   94.977766] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2800-0x287f has been reserved
> >  [   94.987766] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2880-0x28ff has been reserved
> >  [   94.997734] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2c00-0x2c7f has been reserved
> >  [   95.017708] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2c80-0x2cff has been reserved
> >  [   95.024234] system 00:06: iomem range 0x0-0x0 could not be reserved
> >  [   95.037678] system 00:06: iomem range 0xfee01000-0xfeefffff could
> >  not be reserved
> >  [   95.060158] system 00:06: iomem range 0xefa80000-0xefabffff has been reserved
> >  [   95.070158] system 00:06: iomem range 0xffb00000-0xffbfffff could
> >  not be reserved
> >  [   95.077633] system 00:06: iomem range 0xfff00000-0xffffffff could
> >  not be reserved
> >  [   95.097590] system 00:08: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec00fff could
> >  not be reserved
> >  [   95.120064] system 00:08: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee00fff could
> >  not be reserved
> >  [   95.130070] system 00:0c: ioport range 0x290-0x297 has been reserved
> >  [   95.137523] system 00:0d: iomem range 0x0-0x9ffff could not be reserved
> >  [   95.157495] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xc0000-0xcffff has been reserved
> >  [   95.167495] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xe0000-0xfffff could not be reserved
> >  [   95.177463] system 00:0d: iomem range 0x100000-0xdfffffff could not
> >  be reserved
> >  [   95.197437] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xffffffff could
> >  not be reserved
> >  [   95.219983] initcall pnp_system_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 162 msecs
> >  [   95.226887] calling  chr_dev_init+0x0/0xd0()
> >  [   95.237813] initcall chr_dev_init+0x0/0xd0() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [   95.247378] calling  firmware_class_init+0x0/0x90()
> >  [   95.257320] initcall firmware_class_init+0x0/0x90() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [   95.276031] calling  loopback_init+0x0/0x20()
> >  [   95.288590] initcall loopback_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [   95.296837] calling  cpufreq_gov_performance_init+0x0/0x20()
> >  [   95.309084] initcall cpufreq_gov_performance_init+0x0/0x20()
> >  returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [   95.317734] calling  cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x0/0x50()
> >  [   95.338090] initcall cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x0/0x50() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> >  [   95.345254] calling  init_acpi_pm_clocksource+0x0/0xc0()
> >  [   95.355293] initcall init_acpi_pm_clocksource+0x0/0xc0() returned 0
> >  after 0 msecs
> >  [   95.374115] calling  pcibios_assign_resources+0x0/0x90()
> >  [   95.379618] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:06.0
> >  [   95.394087]   IO window: disabled.
> >  [   95.397502]   MEM window: 0xeff00000-0xefffffff
> >  [   95.402032]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000eef00000-0x00000000eeffffff
> >  [   95.415189] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0b.0
> >  [   95.418860]   IO window: e000-efff
> >  [   95.438075]   MEM window: 0xefe00000-0xefefffff
> >  [   95.442610]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> >  [   95.455526] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0c.0
> >  [   95.459197]   IO window: disabled.
> >  [   95.462604]   MEM window: 0xefd00000-0xefdfffff
> >  [   95.475513]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> >  [   95.479443] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0d.0
> >  [   95.485512]   IO window: disabled.
> >  [   95.495480]   MEM window: 0xefc00000-0xefcfffff
> >  [   95.500010]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> >  [   95.515455] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0f.0
> >  [   95.519124]   IO window: d000-dfff
> >  [   95.522533]   MEM window: 0xefb00000-0xefbfffff
> >  [   95.535423]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000e0000000-0x00000000e7ffffff
> >  [   95.545456] initcall pcibios_assign_resources+0x0/0x90() returned 0
> >  after 79 msecs
> >  [   95.557830] calling  fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask+0x0/0x100()
> >  [   95.575408] initcall fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask+0x0/0x100() returned 0
> >  after 0 msecs
> >  [   95.593777] calling  inet_init+0x0/0x380()
> >  [   95.597890] NET: Registered protocol family 2
> >
> >  -> same hang, no reaction to SysRq.
> >
> >  What looks suspicious: The call to pcie_aspm_init is just before the
> >  temporary hang. When I used make oldconfig to upgrade the .config from
> >  2.6.25-rc3-mm1 to -rc5-mm1 I activated the new option CONFIG_PCIEASPM.
> >
> >  I will try with CONFIG_PCIEASPM_DEBUG added and completely without this option.
> 
> CONFIG_PCIEASPM does not change anything.
> Also testing the range of ipc patches you suggested to Badari did not fix it.
> 
> I did a bisect, these patches are currently remaining, but I dod not
> have the time for more bisect steps until tomorrow:

OK, thanks for persisting.

> git-scsi-misc
> git-sh
> execute-tasklets-in-the-same-order-they-were-queued
> git-sched
> sched: work around hrtick related lockup
> sched: make sure jiffies is up to date before calling __update_rq_clock()
> sched: fix rq->clock overflows detection with CONFIG_NO_HZ
> sched: make cpu_clock() globally synchronous
> sched: remove isolcpus
> ftrace: make the task state char-string visible to all
> sched: add latency tracer callbacks to the scheduler

the sched patches, perhaps..

> latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit
> sched: cleanup old and rarely used 'debug' features.
> [SCSI] zfcp: convert zfcp to use target reset and device reset handler
> [SCSI] qla4xxx: Add target reset functionality
> [SCSI] scsi_error: add target reset handler
> [SCSI] ps3rom: Simplify fill_from_dev_buffer()
> [SCSI] scsi_debug: use shost_priv macro
> [SCSI] scsi_debug: remove unnecessary checking
> [SCSI] scsi_debug: remove scsi_debug.h
> [SCSI] scsi_debug: stop including drivers/scsi/scsi.h
> [SCSI] Remove random noop unchecked_isa_dma users
> [SCSI] aacraid: READ_CAPACITY_16 shouldn't trust allocation length in cdb
> [SCSI] st: show options currently set in sysfs
> [SCSI] st: add option to use SILI in variable block reads
> [SCSI] gdth: remove command accessors
> [SCSI] aic94xx: Use sas_request_addr() to provide SAS WWN if the
> adapter lacks one
> [SCSI] libsas: Provide a transport-level facility to request SAS addrs
> [SCSI] ips: sg chaining support to the path to non I/O commands
> [SCSI] gdth: convert to PCI hotplug API
> [SCSI] gdth: PCI probe cleanups, prep for PCI hotplug API conversion
> rtc: rtc-sh: Add support for periodic IRQs.
> sh: SuperH KEYSC keypad data for Solution Engine 7722
> sh: SuperH KEYSC keypad data for MigoR
> sh: SuperH KEYSC platform driver
> 

Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1

[Badari Pulavarty]

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 15:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:05:11 +0100
> "Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Torsten Kaiser
> > <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Andrew Morton
> > > <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > >  OK, so it looks like it died during networking initialisation.
> > >  >
> > >  >  Could you please add initcall_debug to the boot command line so we can see
> > >  >  which function it is getting stuck in?
> > >
> > >  Yes, here is the result:
> > >  [    2.573979] PCI-DMA: Disabling AGP.
> > >  [    2.577639] PCI-DMA: aperture base @ 8000000 size 65536 KB
> > >  [    2.589504] PCI-DMA: using GART IOMMU.
> > >  [    2.593258] PCI-DMA: Reserving 64MB of IOMMU area in the AGP aperture
> > >  [    2.600132] initcall pci_iommu_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 19 msecs
> > >  [    2.622146] calling  hpet_late_init+0x0/0x140()
> > >  [    2.626689] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 31
> > >  [    2.633022] hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz
> > >  [    2.638562] initcall hpet_late_init+0x0/0x140() returned 0 after 9 msecs
> > >  [    2.654545] calling  clocksource_done_booting+0x0/0x20()
> > >  [    2.659855] initcall clocksource_done_booting+0x0/0x20()<6>Time:
> > >
> > > hpet clocksource has been installed.
> > >  [    2.662185]  returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [    2.688448] calling  init_pipe_fs+0x0/0x60()
> > >  [    2.695423] initcall init_pipe_fs+0x0/0x60() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [    2.705784] calling  init_mnt_writers+0x0/0x70()
> > >  [    2.711681] initcall init_mnt_writers+0x0/0x70() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [    2.721678] calling  eventpoll_init+0x0/0x90()
> > >  [    2.731644] initcall eventpoll_init+0x0/0x90() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [    2.738295] calling  anon_inode_init+0x0/0x130()
> > >  [    2.751614] initcall anon_inode_init+0x0/0x130() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [    2.771585] calling  pcie_aspm_init+0x0/0x30()
> > >  [    2.779297] initcall pcie_aspm_init+0x0/0x30() returned 0 after 2 msecs
> > >  [    2.793911] calling  acpi_event_init+0x0/0x52()
> > >
> > >  -> it looked like the system this time already hung here. But just
> > >  pressing the 'Alt' key let the system continue until the network hang.
> > >  (I tried this a second time, again it paused here until I pressed a key)
> > >
> > >  [   94.857929] initcall acpi_event_init+0x0/0x52() returned 0 after 29276 msecs
> > >  [   94.865002] calling  pnp_system_init+0x0/0x20()
> > >  [   94.877935] system 00:06: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved
> > >  [   94.884286] system 00:06: ioport range 0x7b0-0x7df has been reserved
> > >  [   94.897886] system 00:06: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved
> > >  [   94.907886] system 00:06: ioport range 0xbb0-0xbdf has been reserved
> > >  [   94.917855] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2000-0x207f has been reserved
> > >  [   94.937827] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2080-0x20ff has been reserved
> > >  [   94.947827] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2400-0x247f has been reserved
> > >  [   94.957793] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2480-0x24ff has been reserved
> > >  [   94.977766] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2800-0x287f has been reserved
> > >  [   94.987766] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2880-0x28ff has been reserved
> > >  [   94.997734] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2c00-0x2c7f has been reserved
> > >  [   95.017708] system 00:06: ioport range 0x2c80-0x2cff has been reserved
> > >  [   95.024234] system 00:06: iomem range 0x0-0x0 could not be reserved
> > >  [   95.037678] system 00:06: iomem range 0xfee01000-0xfeefffff could
> > >  not be reserved
> > >  [   95.060158] system 00:06: iomem range 0xefa80000-0xefabffff has been reserved
> > >  [   95.070158] system 00:06: iomem range 0xffb00000-0xffbfffff could
> > >  not be reserved
> > >  [   95.077633] system 00:06: iomem range 0xfff00000-0xffffffff could
> > >  not be reserved
> > >  [   95.097590] system 00:08: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec00fff could
> > >  not be reserved
> > >  [   95.120064] system 00:08: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee00fff could
> > >  not be reserved
> > >  [   95.130070] system 00:0c: ioport range 0x290-0x297 has been reserved
> > >  [   95.137523] system 00:0d: iomem range 0x0-0x9ffff could not be reserved
> > >  [   95.157495] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xc0000-0xcffff has been reserved
> > >  [   95.167495] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xe0000-0xfffff could not be reserved
> > >  [   95.177463] system 00:0d: iomem range 0x100000-0xdfffffff could not
> > >  be reserved
> > >  [   95.197437] system 00:0d: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xffffffff could
> > >  not be reserved
> > >  [   95.219983] initcall pnp_system_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 162 msecs
> > >  [   95.226887] calling  chr_dev_init+0x0/0xd0()
> > >  [   95.237813] initcall chr_dev_init+0x0/0xd0() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [   95.247378] calling  firmware_class_init+0x0/0x90()
> > >  [   95.257320] initcall firmware_class_init+0x0/0x90() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [   95.276031] calling  loopback_init+0x0/0x20()
> > >  [   95.288590] initcall loopback_init+0x0/0x20() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [   95.296837] calling  cpufreq_gov_performance_init+0x0/0x20()
> > >  [   95.309084] initcall cpufreq_gov_performance_init+0x0/0x20()
> > >  returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [   95.317734] calling  cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x0/0x50()
> > >  [   95.338090] initcall cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x0/0x50() returned 0 after 0 msecs
> > >  [   95.345254] calling  init_acpi_pm_clocksource+0x0/0xc0()
> > >  [   95.355293] initcall init_acpi_pm_clocksource+0x0/0xc0() returned 0
> > >  after 0 msecs
> > >  [   95.374115] calling  pcibios_assign_resources+0x0/0x90()
> > >  [   95.379618] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:06.0
> > >  [   95.394087]   IO window: disabled.
> > >  [   95.397502]   MEM window: 0xeff00000-0xefffffff
> > >  [   95.402032]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000eef00000-0x00000000eeffffff
> > >  [   95.415189] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0b.0
> > >  [   95.418860]   IO window: e000-efff
> > >  [   95.438075]   MEM window: 0xefe00000-0xefefffff
> > >  [   95.442610]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> > >  [   95.455526] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0c.0
> > >  [   95.459197]   IO window: disabled.
> > >  [   95.462604]   MEM window: 0xefd00000-0xefdfffff
> > >  [   95.475513]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> > >  [   95.479443] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0d.0
> > >  [   95.485512]   IO window: disabled.
> > >  [   95.495480]   MEM window: 0xefc00000-0xefcfffff
> > >  [   95.500010]   PREFETCH window: disabled.
> > >  [   95.515455] PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:0f.0
> > >  [   95.519124]   IO window: d000-dfff
> > >  [   95.522533]   MEM window: 0xefb00000-0xefbfffff
> > >  [   95.535423]   PREFETCH window: 0x00000000e0000000-0x00000000e7ffffff
> > >  [   95.545456] initcall pcibios_assign_resources+0x0/0x90() returned 0
> > >  after 79 msecs
> > >  [   95.557830] calling  fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask+0x0/0x100()
> > >  [   95.575408] initcall fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask+0x0/0x100() returned 0
> > >  after 0 msecs
> > >  [   95.593777] calling  inet_init+0x0/0x380()
> > >  [   95.597890] NET: Registered protocol family 2
> > >
> > >  -> same hang, no reaction to SysRq.
> > >
> > >  What looks suspicious: The call to pcie_aspm_init is just before the
> > >  temporary hang. When I used make oldconfig to upgrade the .config from
> > >  2.6.25-rc3-mm1 to -rc5-mm1 I activated the new option CONFIG_PCIEASPM.
> > >
> > >  I will try with CONFIG_PCIEASPM_DEBUG added and completely without this option.
> > 
> > CONFIG_PCIEASPM does not change anything.
> > Also testing the range of ipc patches you suggested to Badari did not fix it.
> > 
> > I did a bisect, these patches are currently remaining, but I dod not
> > have the time for more bisect steps until tomorrow:
> 
> OK, thanks for persisting.
> 
> > git-scsi-misc
> > git-sh
> > execute-tasklets-in-the-same-order-they-were-queued
> > git-sched
> > sched: work around hrtick related lockup
> > sched: make sure jiffies is up to date before calling __update_rq_clock()
> > sched: fix rq->clock overflows detection with CONFIG_NO_HZ
> > sched: make cpu_clock() globally synchronous
> > sched: remove isolcpus
> > ftrace: make the task state char-string visible to all
> > sched: add latency tracer callbacks to the scheduler

Yes. I found the following patch to be the culprit.

sched: make sure jiffies is up to date before calling __update_rq_clock
()

Torsten, looking at your output, it looks like it hung at the same
place. Backing out this patch should help. Try it out. I am sure
you also have CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP=y in your config ?


commit 60befbc1c0b6d141c9c26e61ddd303aedd1e7396
Author: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@yahoo.fr>
Date:   Mon Mar 10 08:16:41 2008 +0100

    sched: make sure jiffies is up to date before calling
__update_rq_clock()

    Now that __update_rq_clock() uses jiffies to detect clock overflows,
    make sure jiffies are up to date before touch_softlockup_watchdog().

    Removed a touch_softlockup_watchdog() call becoming redundant with
the
    added tick_nohz_update_jiffies().

    Signed-off-by: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@yahoo.fr>
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
 #include <linux/unistd.h>
 #include <linux/pagemap.h>
 #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
+#include <linux/tick.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
@@ -913,7 +914,7 @@ void sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(u64 delta_ns)
        rq->prev_clock_raw = now;
        rq->clock += delta_ns;
        spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-       touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+       tick_nohz_update_jiffies();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event);

Thanks,
Badari

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Tilman Schmidt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1163 bytes --]

Am 13.03.2008 23:21 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> Tilman Schmidt wrote:

>> ts@xenon:~/kernel> /usr/sbin/sendmail -t < patch-usb-reduce-syslog-clutter-v3
>> postdrop: warning: can't open /proc/net/if_inet6 (Permission denied) - skipping IPv6 configuration
>> postdrop: fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for ::1
>> sendmail: warning: command "/usr/sbin/postdrop -r" exited with status 1
>> sendmail: fatal: ts(1000): unable to execute /usr/sbin/postdrop -r: Success
>> ts@xenon:~/kernel>
>>
>> and unsurprisingly, the mail is not sent. If I do the same as root,
>> everything works as usual, there is no console output from the
>> sendmail command, and the mail goes out as it should. All other
>> networking applications appear to be running normally.

> Is it possible to have your config file used to compile the kernel ?

Sure. You can find it at
http://gollum.phnxsoft.com/~ts/linux/config-2.6.25-rc5-mm1

HTH
T.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 253 bytes --]

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Daniel Lezcano]

Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 13.03.2008 23:21 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> 
>>> ts@xenon:~/kernel> /usr/sbin/sendmail -t < patch-usb-reduce-syslog-clutter-v3
>>> postdrop: warning: can't open /proc/net/if_inet6 (Permission denied) - skipping IPv6 configuration
>>> postdrop: fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for ::1
>>> sendmail: warning: command "/usr/sbin/postdrop -r" exited with status 1
>>> sendmail: fatal: ts(1000): unable to execute /usr/sbin/postdrop -r: Success
>>> ts@xenon:~/kernel>
>>>
>>> and unsurprisingly, the mail is not sent. If I do the same as root,
>>> everything works as usual, there is no console output from the
>>> sendmail command, and the mail goes out as it should. All other
>>> networking applications appear to be running normally.
> 
>> Is it possible to have your config file used to compile the kernel ?
> 
> Sure. You can find it at
> http://gollum.phnxsoft.com/~ts/linux/config-2.6.25-rc5-mm1

Thanks,

I was not able to reproduce it, but I think I didn't configured postfix 
as I should had. What version do you use ?
If I may ask you, can you put your postfix configuration file and a 
strace -f of your failing command ? on your website, that will help me a 
lot to investigate.

   -- Daniel

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Benjamin Thery]

I also tried to reproduce your problem with Postfix (on a Debian
distro) but failed to
obtain the error message.

While googling for the error string, I found this link which report
the same kind of
error when Postfix is used with grsecurity (in 2006):

http://blog.jensthebrain.de/archives/2006/12/11/IPv6-Probleme-mit-Postfix-und-grsecurity

I barely understand German so I'm not sure it is related to your problem.

Benjamin


On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com> wrote:
> Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>  > Am 13.03.2008 23:21 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>  >> Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>  >
>  >>> ts@xenon:~/kernel> /usr/sbin/sendmail -t < patch-usb-reduce-syslog-clutter-v3
>  >>> postdrop: warning: can't open /proc/net/if_inet6 (Permission denied) - skipping IPv6 configuration
>  >>> postdrop: fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for ::1
>  >>> sendmail: warning: command "/usr/sbin/postdrop -r" exited with status 1
>  >>> sendmail: fatal: ts(1000): unable to execute /usr/sbin/postdrop -r: Success
>  >>> ts@xenon:~/kernel>
>  >>>
>  >>> and unsurprisingly, the mail is not sent. If I do the same as root,
>  >>> everything works as usual, there is no console output from the
>  >>> sendmail command, and the mail goes out as it should. All other
>  >>> networking applications appear to be running normally.
>  >
>  >> Is it possible to have your config file used to compile the kernel ?
>  >
>  > Sure. You can find it at
>  > http://gollum.phnxsoft.com/~ts/linux/config-2.6.25-rc5-mm1
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  I was not able to reproduce it, but I think I didn't configured postfix
>  as I should had. What version do you use ?
>  If I may ask you, can you put your postfix configuration file and a
>  strace -f of your failing command ? on your website, that will help me a
>  lot to investigate.
>
>    -- Daniel
>
>
> --
>  To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>  the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>  More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Tilman Schmidt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 767 bytes --]

Daniel Lezcano schrieb:

> I was not able to reproduce it, but I think I didn't configured postfix 
> as I should had. What version do you use ?

It's the one that comes with openSUSE 10.3:

ts@xenon:~> rpm -q postfix
postfix-2.4.5-20.2

> If I may ask you, can you put your postfix configuration file and a 
> strace -f of your failing command ? on your website, that will help me a 
> lot to investigate.

Sure, no problem. You may find them at

http://gollum.phnxsoft.com/~ts/linux/main.cf
http://gollum.phnxsoft.com/~ts/linux/strace.log

HTH
T.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Daniel Lezcano]

Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano schrieb:
> 
>> I was not able to reproduce it, but I think I didn't configured 
>> postfix as I should had. What version do you use ?
> 
> It's the one that comes with openSUSE 10.3:
> 
> ts@xenon:~> rpm -q postfix
> postfix-2.4.5-20.2
> 
>> If I may ask you, can you put your postfix configuration file and a 
>> strace -f of your failing command ? on your website, that will help me 
>> a lot to investigate.
> 
> Sure, no problem. You may find them at
> 
> http://gollum.phnxsoft.com/~ts/linux/main.cf
> http://gollum.phnxsoft.com/~ts/linux/strace.log

Thank you very much,  I will try to reproduce it with a simple program.

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Tilman Schmidt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1426 bytes --]

Benjamin Thery schrieb:
> While googling for the error string, I found this link which report
> the same kind of
> error when Postfix is used with grsecurity (in 2006):
> 
> http://blog.jensthebrain.de/archives/2006/12/11/IPv6-Probleme-mit-Postfix-und-grsecurity
> 
> I barely understand German so I'm not sure it is related to your problem.

The userspace failure described there is indeed the same as mine:
Postfix' sendmail command tries to open "/proc/net/if_inet6"
which fails with EACCES.

But I have never installed grsecurity on this machine, and the
problem appeared for me only with kernel 2.6.25-rc5-mm1, not when
running kernel 2.6.25-rc5 on the same machine, so I guess the
cause must be something different.

What's also strange is that I can "cat /proc/net/if_inet6" from
the command line as the same non-root user with no problem at all.
strace of "cat /proc/net/if_inet6" has:

open("/proc/net/if_inet6", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3

strace of "/usr/sbin/sendmail", however:

open("/proc/net/if_inet6", O_RDONLY) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)

Both run as

ts@xenon:~> id
uid=1000(ts) gid=100(users) groups=0(root),14(uucp),16(dialout),33(video),100(users),112(bacula)

HTH
T.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Benjamin Thery]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5687 bytes --]

Tilman,

I've finally managed to reproduce your problem with Postfix on one of
my victims.

Earlier, in the afternoon, I wrote a piece of code that triggered a
similar behaviour,
but I wasn't sure it was exactly the problem you found. So, I've
rebuilt Postfix, added
some traces and, voila, same issue as yours.
(The version of Postfix originally  installed on my machine seems to
have IPv6 disabled)

I bisected the problem to the commit "[NET]: Make /proc/net a symlink
on /proc/self/net (v3)"

Here is what happens:

- Recently /proc/net has been moved to /proc/self/net, and
/proc/self/net is a symlink
  on this directory.
- Before that everybody could access /proc/net and read /proc/net/if_inet6:
   dr-xr-xr-x   6 root      root              0 2008-03-05 15:23 /proc/net

- Now, /proc/self/net has a more restrictive access mode and ony the
owner of the
  process can enter the directory:
  dr-xr--r-- 5 toto toto 0 Mar 19 17:30 net

  This is not a problem in most of the cases, but it becomes annoying
when a process
  decides to change its UID or GID. It may loose access to its own
/proc/self/net entries.

- What happens in the Postfix case is the 'sendmail' process executes the
   '/usr/sbin/postdrop' binary to enqueue the message, but unfortunately
   '/usr/bin/postdrop' has the setgid bit set:
   -rwxr-sr-x 1 root postdrop 479475 Mar 19 17:14 /usr/sbin/postdrop

   The process egid changes and this seems to be problematic to access
   /proc/self/net/if_inet6. :)

I've attached a tiny test program that can be used to reproduce the problem
without Postfix.
- Either execute it as root and give it an unprivileged uid in argument
  ./test-proc_net_if_inet6 1001

- Or change its ownership and access mode to: -rwxr-sr-x root postdrop
  and execute it as a lambda user.
   chown root:postdrop test-proc_net_if_inet6; chmod 2755 test-proc_net_if_inet6
   ./test-proc_net_if_inet6

I've found the cause but not the fix. :)
(Adding Pavel in cc:)

Regards,
Benjamin


On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> wrote:
> Am 11.03.2008 09:14 schrieb Andrew Morton:
>  > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-mm1/
>
>  I'm noticing a strange effect with this:
>
>  On my openSUSE 10.3 development machine with SUSEs default MTA
>  Postfix installed, I occasionally send a pre-formatted mail by
>  feeding it directly into "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t". If I try that
>  while running a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 kernel, I get:
>
>  ts@xenon:~/kernel> /usr/sbin/sendmail -t < patch-usb-reduce-syslog-clutter-v3
>  postdrop: warning: can't open /proc/net/if_inet6 (Permission denied) - skipping IPv6 configuration
>  postdrop: fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for ::1
>  sendmail: warning: command "/usr/sbin/postdrop -r" exited with status 1
>  sendmail: fatal: ts(1000): unable to execute /usr/sbin/postdrop -r: Success
>  ts@xenon:~/kernel>
>
>  and unsurprisingly, the mail is not sent. If I do the same as root,
>  everything works as usual, there is no console output from the
>  sendmail command, and the mail goes out as it should. All other
>  networking applications appear to be running normally.
>
>  On a 2.6.25-rc5 (non-mm) kernel I do not need to run the sendmail
>  command as root. It works just as well if I run it as myself.
>
>  IPv6 is not in use on that machine. The Ethernet interface has
>  just the link local IPv6 address. Possibly relevant information:
>
>  ts@xenon:~> /sbin/ifconfig -a
>  eth0      Protokoll:Ethernet  Hardware Adresse 00:19:D1:03:D8:FF
>           inet Adresse:192.168.59.102  Bcast:192.168.59.255  Maske:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 Adresse: fe80::219:d1ff:fe03:d8ff/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung
>           UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:78 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:145 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:100
>           RX bytes:9547 (9.3 Kb)  TX bytes:17952 (17.5 Kb)
>           Speicher:92c00000-92c20000
>
>  lo        Protokoll:Lokale Schleife
>           inet Adresse:127.0.0.1  Maske:255.0.0.0
>           inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>           RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0
>           RX bytes:100 (100.0 b)  TX bytes:100 (100.0 b)
>
>  ts@xenon:~/kernel> ls -l /proc/net/if_inet6
>  -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 13. Mär 19:26 /proc/net/if_inet6
>  ts@xenon:~> cat /proc/net/if_inet6
>  fe800000000000000219d1fffe03d8ff 02 40 20 80     eth0
>  00000000000000000000000000000001 01 80 10 80       lo
>  ts@xenon:~> uname -a
>  Linux xenon 2.6.25-rc5-mm1-testing #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 11 14:34:49 CET 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
>  As you see, I can cat /proc/net/if_inet6 as regular (non-root) user
>  just fine, even though Postfix complains it cannot access it.
>  The content of /proc/net/if_inet6 is identical if I cat it on
>  kernel 2.6.25-rc5 mainline.
>
>  CCing a selection of IPv6 networking related maintainer addresses.
>  If you need more information or want me to test something, let me
>  know.
>
>  HTH
>  T.
>
>  --
>  Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
>  Bonn, Germany
>  Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
>  Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
>
>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: test-proc_net_if_inet6.c --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc; name=test-proc_net_if_inet6.c, Size: 497 bytes --]

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	FILE *fp;
	uid_t uid;

	if (argc > 1) {
		uid = atoi(argv[1]);
		if (setuid(uid) < 0) {
			perror("setuid");
			return 1;
		}
	}

	printf("PID=%d UID=%d GID=%d\n", getpid(), geteuid(), getegid());

	if ((fp = fopen("/proc/net/if_inet6", "r")) != 0) {
		printf("PASS: /proc/net/if_inet6 opened\n");
		fclose(fp);
	} else {
		printf("FAIL: Can't open /proc/net/if_inet6\n");
		return 1;
	}
	return 0;
}

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:52:41 +0100
"Benjamin Thery" <ben.thery@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tilman,
> 
> I've finally managed to reproduce your problem with Postfix on one of
> my victims.
> 
> Earlier, in the afternoon, I wrote a piece of code that triggered a
> similar behaviour,
> but I wasn't sure it was exactly the problem you found. So, I've
> rebuilt Postfix, added
> some traces and, voila, same issue as yours.
> (The version of Postfix originally  installed on my machine seems to
> have IPv6 disabled)
> 
> I bisected the problem to the commit "[NET]: Make /proc/net a symlink
> on /proc/self/net (v3)"
> 
> Here is what happens:
> 
> - Recently /proc/net has been moved to /proc/self/net, and
> /proc/self/net is a symlink
>   on this directory.
> - Before that everybody could access /proc/net and read /proc/net/if_inet6:
>    dr-xr-xr-x   6 root      root              0 2008-03-05 15:23 /proc/net
> 
> - Now, /proc/self/net has a more restrictive access mode and ony the
> owner of the
>   process can enter the directory:
>   dr-xr--r-- 5 toto toto 0 Mar 19 17:30 net
> 
>   This is not a problem in most of the cases, but it becomes annoying
> when a process
>   decides to change its UID or GID. It may loose access to its own
> /proc/self/net entries.
> 
> - What happens in the Postfix case is the 'sendmail' process executes the
>    '/usr/sbin/postdrop' binary to enqueue the message, but unfortunately
>    '/usr/bin/postdrop' has the setgid bit set:
>    -rwxr-sr-x 1 root postdrop 479475 Mar 19 17:14 /usr/sbin/postdrop
> 
>    The process egid changes and this seems to be problematic to access
>    /proc/self/net/if_inet6. :)
> 
> I've attached a tiny test program that can be used to reproduce the problem
> without Postfix.
> - Either execute it as root and give it an unprivileged uid in argument
>   ./test-proc_net_if_inet6 1001
> 
> - Or change its ownership and access mode to: -rwxr-sr-x root postdrop
>   and execute it as a lambda user.
>    chown root:postdrop test-proc_net_if_inet6; chmod 2755 test-proc_net_if_inet6
>    ./test-proc_net_if_inet6
> 
> I've found the cause but not the fix. :)
> (Adding Pavel in cc:)
> 

Thanks for that - most useful.

Although this is advertised as a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 problem, I assume the
regression is also in mainline? 2.6.25-rc6?

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Benjamin Thery]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:52:41 +0100
>  "Benjamin Thery" <ben.thery@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  > Tilman,
>  >
>  > I've finally managed to reproduce your problem with Postfix on one of
>  > my victims.
>  >
>  > Earlier, in the afternoon, I wrote a piece of code that triggered a
>  > similar behaviour,
>  > but I wasn't sure it was exactly the problem you found. So, I've
>  > rebuilt Postfix, added
>  > some traces and, voila, same issue as yours.
>  > (The version of Postfix originally  installed on my machine seems to
>  > have IPv6 disabled)
>  >
>  > I bisected the problem to the commit "[NET]: Make /proc/net a symlink
>  > on /proc/self/net (v3)"
>  >
>  > Here is what happens:
>  >
>  > - Recently /proc/net has been moved to /proc/self/net, and
>  > /proc/self/net is a symlink
>  >   on this directory.
>  > - Before that everybody could access /proc/net and read /proc/net/if_inet6:
>  >    dr-xr-xr-x   6 root      root              0 2008-03-05 15:23 /proc/net
>  >
>  > - Now, /proc/self/net has a more restrictive access mode and ony the
>  > owner of the
>  >   process can enter the directory:
>  >   dr-xr--r-- 5 toto toto 0 Mar 19 17:30 net
>  >
>  >   This is not a problem in most of the cases, but it becomes annoying
>  > when a process
>  >   decides to change its UID or GID. It may loose access to its own
>  > /proc/self/net entries.
>  >
>  > - What happens in the Postfix case is the 'sendmail' process executes the
>  >    '/usr/sbin/postdrop' binary to enqueue the message, but unfortunately
>  >    '/usr/bin/postdrop' has the setgid bit set:
>  >    -rwxr-sr-x 1 root postdrop 479475 Mar 19 17:14 /usr/sbin/postdrop
>  >
>  >    The process egid changes and this seems to be problematic to access
>  >    /proc/self/net/if_inet6. :)
>  >
>  > I've attached a tiny test program that can be used to reproduce the problem
>  > without Postfix.
>  > - Either execute it as root and give it an unprivileged uid in argument
>  >   ./test-proc_net_if_inet6 1001
>  >
>  > - Or change its ownership and access mode to: -rwxr-sr-x root postdrop
>  >   and execute it as a lambda user.
>  >    chown root:postdrop test-proc_net_if_inet6; chmod 2755 test-proc_net_if_inet6
>  >    ./test-proc_net_if_inet6
>  >
>  > I've found the cause but not the fix. :)
>  > (Adding Pavel in cc:)
>  >
>
>  Thanks for that - most useful.
>
>  Although this is advertised as a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 problem, I assume the
>  regression is also in mainline? 2.6.25-rc6?

Yes, it is in mainline. I reproduced it on 2.6.25-rc5.

Benjamin

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[David Miller]

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:16:08 -0700

> Although this is advertised as a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 problem, I assume the
> regression is also in mainline? 2.6.25-rc6?

It is in 2.6.25-rc6, correct.

If Pavel or someone else doesn't produce a good fix soon
I'll revert the guilty change as this bug is worse than
the problem that changeset fixes.

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Tilman Schmidt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 790 bytes --]

Am 19.03.2008 22:16 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:52:41 +0100
> "Benjamin Thery" <ben.thery@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I bisected the problem to the commit "[NET]: Make /proc/net a symlink
>> on /proc/self/net (v3)"
[...]
>> I've attached a tiny test program that can be used to reproduce the problem
>> without Postfix.

Thanks. Works great.

> Although this is advertised as a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 problem, I assume the
> regression is also in mainline? 2.6.25-rc6?

My results:

up to 2.6.25-rc5 -- good
2.6.25-rc5-mm1 -- bad
2.6.25-rc6 -- bad

HTH
T.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 253 bytes --]

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Benjamin Thery]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:49 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>  Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:16:08 -0700
>
>
>  > Although this is advertised as a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 problem, I assume the
>  > regression is also in mainline? 2.6.25-rc6?
>
>  It is in 2.6.25-rc6, correct.
>
>  If Pavel or someone else doesn't produce a good fix soon
>  I'll revert the guilty change as this bug is worse than
>  the problem that changeset fixes.

Andre Noll sent a patch to LKML, acked by Pavel:

"Fix permissions of /proc/net"
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/655148

Benjamin

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, 20 of March 2008, Benjamin Thery wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:49 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >  Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:16:08 -0700
> >
> >
> >  > Although this is advertised as a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 problem, I assume the
> >  > regression is also in mainline? 2.6.25-rc6?
> >
> >  It is in 2.6.25-rc6, correct.
> >
> >  If Pavel or someone else doesn't produce a good fix soon
> >  I'll revert the guilty change as this bug is worse than
> >  the problem that changeset fixes.
> 
> Andre Noll sent a patch to LKML, acked by Pavel:
> 
> "Fix permissions of /proc/net"
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/655148

Have you tested that patch?

Rafael

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Pavel Emelyanov]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 20 of March 2008, Benjamin Thery wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:49 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>>  Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:16:08 -0700
>>>
>>>
>>>  > Although this is advertised as a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 problem, I assume the
>>>  > regression is also in mainline? 2.6.25-rc6?
>>>
>>>  It is in 2.6.25-rc6, correct.
>>>
>>>  If Pavel or someone else doesn't produce a good fix soon
>>>  I'll revert the guilty change as this bug is worse than
>>>  the problem that changeset fixes.
>> Andre Noll sent a patch to LKML, acked by Pavel:
>>
>> "Fix permissions of /proc/net"
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/655148
> 
> Have you tested that patch?

I did - works OK, that's why I Acked it.

> Rafael
> 

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Benjamin Thery]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote:
>
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>  > On Thursday, 20 of March 2008, Benjamin Thery wrote:
>  >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:49 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>  >>> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>  >>>  Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:16:08 -0700
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>  > Although this is advertised as a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 problem, I assume the
>  >>>  > regression is also in mainline? 2.6.25-rc6?
>  >>>
>  >>>  It is in 2.6.25-rc6, correct.
>  >>>
>  >>>  If Pavel or someone else doesn't produce a good fix soon
>  >>>  I'll revert the guilty change as this bug is worse than
>  >>>  the problem that changeset fixes.
>  >> Andre Noll sent a patch to LKML, acked by Pavel:
>  >>
>  >> "Fix permissions of /proc/net"
>  >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/655148
>  >
>  > Have you tested that patch?
>
>  I did - works OK, that's why I Acked it.

Also tested here. It fixes the regression.


Benjamin

Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail command as non-root

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, 20 of March 2008, Benjamin Thery wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote:
> >
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >  > On Thursday, 20 of March 2008, Benjamin Thery wrote:
> >  >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:49 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> >  >>> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >  >>>  Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:16:08 -0700
> >  >>>
> >  >>>
> >  >>>  > Although this is advertised as a 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 problem, I assume the
> >  >>>  > regression is also in mainline? 2.6.25-rc6?
> >  >>>
> >  >>>  It is in 2.6.25-rc6, correct.
> >  >>>
> >  >>>  If Pavel or someone else doesn't produce a good fix soon
> >  >>>  I'll revert the guilty change as this bug is worse than
> >  >>>  the problem that changeset fixes.
> >  >> Andre Noll sent a patch to LKML, acked by Pavel:
> >  >>
> >  >> "Fix permissions of /proc/net"
> >  >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/655148
> >  >
> >  > Have you tested that patch?
> >
> >  I did - works OK, that's why I Acked it.
> 
> Also tested here. It fixes the regression.

OK, thanks.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1

[Ingo Molnar]

* Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes. I found the following patch to be the culprit.
> 
> sched: make sure jiffies is up to date before calling __update_rq_clock
> ()

thanks Badari, i've backed out this patch.

	Ingo