netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Cc: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	lksctp-dev <lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCTP: Fix Protocol violation when receiving a error length INIT ACK
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:40:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EAFB12.9040800@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47E915E3.2040501@hp.com>

Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> There is a side-effect to this patch that now we will completely ignore
> the verification
> tag in the INIT-ACK regardless of the violation.
> 
> In particular, if the INIT-ACK contains all the fixed parameters but
> violates structure
> in some variable parameters, we'll currently use the Initiate Tag from
> the INIT-ACK in
> the ABORT.   We should not be changing this behavior.
> 
> The simple hack is to add some conditional code into the the different
> violation functions, but
> I'd like to see if there is a cleaner way to solve this.
 
Vlad,
  The problem you said has been addressed, this is a new patch. Just treat 
  an INIT-ACK received during COOKIE-WAIT as a special case. this patch will
  not break the normal behavior.

Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/net/sctp/command.h |    1 +
 net/sctp/outqueue.c        |    3 +++
 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c   |    5 ++++-
 net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c    |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sctp/command.h b/include/net/sctp/command.h
index 10ae2da..35b1e83 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/command.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/command.h
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ typedef enum {
 	SCTP_CMD_ADAPTATION_IND, /* generate and send adaptation event */
 	SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_SHKEY,    /* generate the association shared keys */
 	SCTP_CMD_T1_RETRAN,	 /* Mark for retransmission after T1 timeout  */
+	SCTP_CMD_UPDATE_INITTAG, /* Update peer inittag */
 	SCTP_CMD_LAST
 } sctp_verb_t;
 
diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
index 1bb3c5c..c071446 100644
--- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
+++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
@@ -793,6 +793,9 @@ int sctp_outq_flush(struct sctp_outq *q, int rtx_timeout)
 			break;
 
 		case SCTP_CID_ABORT:
+			if (sctp_test_T_bit(chunk)) {
+				packet->vtag = asoc->c.my_vtag;
+			}
 		case SCTP_CID_SACK:
 		case SCTP_CID_HEARTBEAT:
 		case SCTP_CID_HEARTBEAT_ACK:
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
index 28eb38e..2dbc7bd 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -1536,7 +1536,10 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type,
 			error = sctp_auth_asoc_init_active_key(asoc,
 						GFP_ATOMIC);
 			break;
-
+		case SCTP_CMD_UPDATE_INITTAG:
+			asoc->peer.i.init_tag = cmd->obj.u32;
+			break;
+			
 		default:
 			printk(KERN_WARNING "Impossible command: %u, %p\n",
 			       cmd->verb, cmd->obj.ptr);
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index f2ed647..b3ed52c 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -4144,6 +4144,24 @@ static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_abort_violation(
 		goto nomem;
 
 	if (asoc) {
+		/* Treat INIT-ACK as a special case during COOKIE-WAIT. */
+		if (chunk->chunk_hdr->type == SCTP_CID_INIT_ACK 
+		    && !asoc->peer.i.init_tag) {
+			sctp_initack_chunk_t *initack;
+
+			initack = (sctp_initack_chunk_t *)chunk->chunk_hdr;
+			if (!sctp_chunk_length_valid(chunk, 
+						     sizeof(sctp_initack_chunk_t)))
+				abort->chunk_hdr->flags |= SCTP_CHUNK_FLAG_T;
+			else {
+				unsigned int inittag;
+				
+				inittag = ntohl(initack->init_hdr.init_tag);
+				sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_UPDATE_INITTAG,
+						SCTP_U32(inittag));
+			}
+		}
+
 		sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort));
 		SCTP_INC_STATS(SCTP_MIB_OUTCTRLCHUNKS);
 
-- 
1.5.3



-- 
Regards
Gui Jianfeng


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-27  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-24  5:39 [PATCH] SCTP: Fix Protocol violation when receiving a error length INIT ACK Gui Jianfeng
2008-03-24  6:32 ` Wei Yongjun
2008-03-25  3:33   ` Gui Jianfeng
2008-03-25  4:46     ` Wei Yongjun
2008-03-25  7:10       ` Gui Jianfeng
2008-03-25 15:10         ` Vlad Yasevich
2008-03-27  1:40           ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2008-03-27 19:55             ` Vlad Yasevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47EAFB12.9040800@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
    --cc=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).