netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Kok,
	 Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:43:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EBF8EE.1000102@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F5204BF07F7@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>

Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> Kok, Auke wrote:
>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> Auke Kok wrote:
>>>> From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Test the MSI interrupt physically once before assuming that it
>>>> actually works. Several platforms have already come across that
>>>> have non-functional MSI interrupts and this code will attempt
>>>> to detect those safely. Once the test succeeds MSI interrupts
>>>> will be enabled.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
> 
>>> Ah, the perennial add-same-test-to-every-driver conundrum.
>>>
>>> I think we are far enough along with MSI to _not_ do this anymore in
>>> drivers. 
> 
> Actually, I'm hoping you'll allow this Jeff, we have a production system
> (see below) we know about that doesn't like the way 82571 formats MSI
> interrupt messages.  All other systems seem to be okay with this format
> of MSI messages, but this system implemented a stricter interpretation
> of the spec, and so even though that system doesn't need a quirk for MSI
> because MSI works in general, we still MUST test the MSI vector to make
> sure it works *for us*  In this case it comes down to being an errata
> workaround.
> 
> Since there is no way to "test" generation of an interrupt from any
> specific hardware device without internal knowledge of said device,
> there isn't a way for us to help the kernel by writing a generic "test
> MSI" routine.
> 
> I would prefer this "generic test" code be in the driver rather than
> having to identify all the chipsets that fail and have the driver do
> *specific chipset* detection ala bnx2.c's 8132 bridge workaround.

Well if it's a problem with the networking chip rather than the 
platform, then absolutely stick it in the driver (unless its so severe 
it needs to be in pci/quirks.c before the driver even loads).

But that seems like a quick id test, with no need for all that generic 
MSI test code.

Certainly the work is scoped based on where the problem lies, either 
platform, device, or platform+device.

	Jeff




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-27 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-26 18:36 [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts Auke Kok
2008-03-26 18:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-26 20:42   ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-03-27 17:53     ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-03-27 19:43       ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-03-27 22:05         ` David Miller
2008-03-27 22:55           ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-03-27 23:06             ` David Miller
2008-03-27 23:38             ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-27 23:53               ` Kok, Auke
2008-03-28  0:03                 ` David Miller
2008-03-27 21:59       ` David Miller
2008-03-27 22:05       ` Andy Gospodarek
2008-03-27 22:16         ` Kok, Auke
2008-03-27 22:33           ` Andy Gospodarek
2008-03-27 22:47             ` Kok, Auke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47EBF8EE.1000102@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).